Human error caused the Nuri accident
Human error was the cause for the S 61 Nuri accident on 13 July 2007, which killed 6 crew last, which include Kept. Nur Intan Asykeen Mohd. Arof, TUDM, a 27 year old female pilot near Genting Sempah, border between Selangor and Pahang. The board of inquiry finding were revealed today by the Deputy Chief of the Royal Malaysian Air Force, Lt. Jen. Dato’ Bashir Abu Bakar, TUDM.
Photographs of the accident site were shown to media that clearly shown the utility helicopter were flying far too close to the jungle canopy and clipped some of the trees, thrice, before it went down. Tests on hydraulics fluid and other fluid samples taken from various apparatus of the aircraft proved that the machine was operating well and no signed of mechanical failure.
Therefore pilot error was concluded as the cause of the mishap in bad weather and low visibility. The aircraft was commandeered by Kept. Nor Azlan Termuzi, TUDM, 29.
Bernama.com has the story on this finding which was made public today in a media conference:
September 27, 2007 20:52 PM
The board of inquiry was led by Lt. Kol. Syed Islam Sahajam, TUDM. The S 61 Nuri twin-engine utility helicopter had been in service with the RMAF since 1968 and was the trusted vehicle and mainstay of logistics and aerial operations when the Army was fighting against the communist terrorists in the interiors of Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak.
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://bigdogdotcom.wordpress.com/2007/09/28/human-error-caused-the-nuri-accident/trackback/


Bro BD,
I don’t know what to make of this. On the one hand public outcry about outdated military equipment or substandard maintenance. Looks like if this report is true then MinDef (and by extension, the Gov’t) will be vindicated. There will be plenty of red faces for sure, esp. those who ranted and raved trying to blame the Gov’t. Perhaps there should be another independent inquiry to clear any doubts…
Pointing the finger at the pilot is a serious allegation. And he and his co-pilot would not have chance to defend themselves. This was a military flight and different rules apply. The pilot was perhaps acting under orders.
Unless of course, this is all spin.
There should be a civilian board of inquiry to clear matters. I’d be wholly suspicious to accept ONLY the military board’s findings at face value… They might have an agenda.
The RMAF board of inquiry include two Lt. Col.s. They are experienced pilots themselves and therefore they could qualify the inquiry report. Pilot error or weather is the usual blame for accidents. The factors blamed for the accident point to pilot error. Infact, the father even said on TV3 during the search for the missing helicopter last July that his son like to fly low, incase of emergency.
Personally, I was involved in maintenance program for the RMAF and Navy and their quality of service is up to mark and spares used are OEMs.
It is not good to get third party, especially civilians involved in military operations, especially people with access to so many info. If you argue it in that manner, third party civilians doing the inquiry usually have bigger ‘agenda’, if not ulterior motive.
Hallo to you! I am an ex-RMAF Caribou aircrew.During my service from 1964 till 1971,I flew many times with the Nuris.I must admit at that time the Choppers were new and the Pilots had very little flying hours.But still, there were almost no accidents involving this machines.In short,after over 30 years Nuri operations I think,accidents will still happen for whatever reasons.It is very sad when young people loose their lives but don’t despair cause all Air Forces have the same problem too.Greetings from Germany