MATTHIAS CHANG’S RESPONSE
TO TUN SALLEH’S CHALLENGE
by Matthias Chang
I was just informed by Rocky that Tun Salleh has issued a challenge to me in response to my article which was published in MALAYSIA TODAY and Bigdogdotcom.wordpress.com
I immediately visited Rocky’s blog to read the challenge and to say that I was most disappointed in Tun Salleh’s challenge, is an understatement.
Why?
He asked me to demand from the government to establish a Royal Commission to investigate into his dismissal. Why should I? I hold the view that the Tribunal had every reason to hold that Tun Salleh had misconducted himself as per the charges.
Is it my responsibility to call for a Royal Commission when a Tribunal convened by King himself found him guilty of all the charges that was proffered against him? He should be the one who should “lobby” the government if he feels strongly that he has been unjustly victimised!
In anticipation of Tun Salleh’s reply that he did not demand a Royal Commission during Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad’s tenure as Prime Minister because it would not receive a favourable response, my query to Tun Salleh is:
Why have you not demanded a Royal Commission after Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad retired in October 2003, and thereafter in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and only now in 2008?
You are legally trained and held the highest judicial office. So, if anyone knows about rights and legal remedies, it must be you. All these years why have you not commenced any legal proceedings to establish, as you have alleged, that you have been wrongfully dismissed? You had a team of senior lawyers advising you. What was their legal advice?
It is a pity that Tun Salleh does not realize that the powers that be have used his dismissal to prop-up the Badawi regime after the 12th General Elections fiasco. Tun Salleh is a mere pawn in this political wayang kulit orchestrated by the spin doctors of the Badawi regime.
In my article, I posed certain questions to Tun Salleh and demanded to know his answers.
Why is Tun Salleh avoiding the issues posed by my questions and diverting the issues by asking me to “lobby” for a Royal Commission?
Tun Salleh should be transparent first and answer my questions.
1) Did Tun write two letters to the Agong? What was the content of the first letter?
2) Did Tun advise his fellow judges, especially the five judges who supported him, the contents of the first letter?
3) If Tun did, what was their response?
4) If Tun did not advise the judges, what were Tun’s reasons for the cover-up?
ROCKY, I am truly disappointed in you. You have read my article and having done so, have you posed the questions to Tun Salleh?
After all, you are assisting in Tun Salleh’s memoirs. Surely, you should be equally interested in the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
Please pose this response in your Blog.
Thank you.
Matthias Chang
25th May 2008 7.25pm
Kuala Lumpur






Masih ada pemimpin UMNO mahukan Ezam kembali?
Khabar angin mengenai kemasukan Mantan Ketua Angkatan Muda PKR Ezam Md. Nor kembali kedalam UMNO kini menarik perhatian ramai. Samada spekulasi ini merupakan sesuatu realiti atau ianya fenomena “jual dulu, baru cari modal” (dalam pendekata Inggerisnya, short selling) sebagai taktik untuk mengembali keyakinan ahli ahli UMNO kepada proses ‘kemasukan dan penerimaan’ Ezam kembali UMNO, merupakan sesuatu yang hanya masa menentukan.
Yang nyatanya, spekulasi kebalinya Ezam kepangkuan UMNO merupakan sesuatu yang “Lebih sudu dari kuah”. Sehinggakan MP BN untuk Pulai Dato’ NurJazlan Mohamed menyifatkan dalam Edge Daily “Episod Mantan Presiden UMNO Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad ‘keluar bersyarat’ dari UMNO tidaklah sehebat ‘ancaman’ Ezam kembali kedalam UMNO dan mempunyai prospek sebagai Ketua Pemuda UMNO”.
Apabila disingkap kembali, siapa Ezam dan apa hebatnya gerangan ini? Mungkin ada dikalangan ahli Pemuda UMNO masih lagi ingat Mantan Pegawai Khas Mantan Timbalan Perdana Menteri Anwar Ibrahim dan Ketua Pemuda Petaling Jaya Selatan ini, yang suatu masa dulu ‘menyelengara’ sekian ramai pemimpin UMNO peringkat Cawangan dalam Bahagian lamanya dulu, dengan kadar bulanan untuk suatu yang tempoh yang cukup strategik.
Ataupun ada yang masih ingat ini merupakan personaliti yang dipenjarakan kerana gagal mempersembahkan kunun kunun “enam kotak” penuh mengandungi pelbagai maklumat rahsia (bawah Akta Rahsia Rasmi) yang cukup kuat untuk memenjarakan beberapa Menteri Kabinet kerana kesalahan rasuah. Persoalanya sekarang, kenapa “enam kotak” ini tidak pernah ditimbulkan lagi oleh sesiapa, termasuk mendesak Ezam mengotakan janji janjinya itu?
Apakah dikalangan pemimpin UMNO hari ini amat “Mudah lupa”? Atau sengaja ‘buat buat lupa’?
Rencana penganalisa politik The Star, Joceline Tan mengenai Ezam dan PKR:
Kini pemimpin kanan Anwar yang telah “Berpatah arang, berkerat rotan” dengan PKR, terutama dengan personaliti seperti Azmin Ali, kerana isu ‘duit’ ingin mencuba nasib kembali bersama UMNO, tatkala UMNO amat lemah dan menglamai krisis Kepimpin yang amat meruncing.
Jika benar, kenapa ada dikalangan UMNO pula yang membuka seluas luas peluang untuk orang yang gagal mengotakan dakwaan tidak berasas ini kembali kepada parti keramat nasionalism Melayu itu?
- Commentary
on May 26, 2008 at 20:51 Comments (13)