Expose War Crimes: Criminalise War

ADDRESS

by

TUN Dr. MAHATHIR MOHAMAD

“EXPOSE WAR CRIMES: CRIMINALISE WAR”

IMPERIAL COLLEGE

KENSINGTON

LONDON

 

 

1.It is heartening to be asked to speak on criminalizing war – a subject that needs to be taken up by all civilized people. How can we claim to be civilized when we condone and legalise mass killings of men, women and children, the old and the sick as a solution to conflicts between nations. We usually consider the most successful killers, the ones who do the most amount of damage as the winners and they are entitled to put thr losers on trial and punish them, including murdering them. The judges in these courts are nationals of the winning countries. There can be no impartiality.

2. Yet at the same time we consider murder as a very serious crime which merit severe punishment. The more civilized countries claim to be so concerned about human life that they have abolished the death penalty, even for murderes.

3. But these same countries and these same people consider the bombing innocent civilians, launching explosive missiles against them, machine gunning and blowing them up with grenades as ligitimise and morally right.

4.There is something wrong there. How can we object to the murder of individual when approve mass killing of innocent people. Yet that is what we do in war – we kill people, not always soldiers who may kill us but, now, more and more often, innocent civilians who can do us no harm.

5. War was in the ancient times a necessary option in the settlement of conflicts between primitive people of nations. But in thoese days the capacity to kill and to destroy was limited. The weapons used were incapable of mass destruction or mass killings. Soldiers had to handle the swords, bows and arrows, spears and daggers themselves. They had to face the enemies who were similarly armed. If they failed to kill the enemy they would be killed themselves.

6. Wars were fought by soldiers on battle fields in those days. Of the necessity the armies were small and the killings were relatively small. The losers would submit to the victors and the war would be over. The killings would also stop.

7. But over time the war-like nations developed more and more lethal weapons and the killings have become more massive. Now we are seeing weapons of mass destruction capable of killing hundreds of thousands, not on battle fields but just about anywhere. The whole country is made a battlefield, sparing neither towns nor countryside, neither soldiers nor civilians, the old, the sick and the disabled men, women and children. The killings and the devastation is total.

8. Such is the callousness of the human race that we see the killings and the wounds inflicted as just numbers, as casualties, and now as collaterals. The warriors gleefully notch their weapons to record scores of kills. It is as if these victims are not human. Yet the sufferings and the pain are very real to these people, to their families and friends.

9. These people may killed by the wounds inflicted, or they may have their limbs and their heads torn off from their bodies while still alive. The sufferings may be over quickly but imagine having parts of your body torn off, your head pulled out from your neck.

10. For those who survive, the pain and the suffering must be terrible. And in most cases no help would be forthcoming, no medical aid and, no hospitals to be taken to. They may lie there on the roads, of the fields or buried and crushed under fallen buildings, for hours with no hope for rescue. They may suffer horribly for hours until death relives them.

11. We are not talking about one or two persons. With modern weapons, hundreds and thousands would experience this horror, the pain and death.

12. We would strive hard to raise money to treat one cancer patient for example. We are so human and humane. Yet we think nothing of killing healthy people by ten of thousands.

13. We read about the war, we even see pictures and TV coverage of war but we hardly ever get to see the real sufferings of the victims of war. We practically enjoy the TV coverage of war without thinking about the sufferings of fellow-humans just like us who had been wounded and killed in real life, not just in the cinema or TV screens

 14. We do not think of the smell of war, of the smell of rotting bodies, of gangrenous legs and arms, because our television cannot bring these odours to our comfortable sitting room. In fact the TV cameras avoid showing the horrors resulting from the war. They do not want to offend our sensitivities. Nor do they record and broadcast the screams of pain of the wounded and the dying.

15. We must all know that war is about pain and death and destruction. But after the civilised countries of the West developed standing armies to replace the irregular rabbles, the state and the leaders of these countries began to glorify war. They promoted the idea that war was noble and those who fought wars and die or were wounded were heroes and the icons of the people. They struck medals to decorate the killers they sent into battle.

16. Soldiers in the standing armies began to be fitted with smart uniforms embellished with stars and gold braids. They glorify the killers with statues and monuments. And stories are told of their exploits i.e. of the murders they committed. Eternal flames burn over their graves.

17. In peace times they were made to parade in their smart uniforms, proudly showing off their skills at marching with precision like so many mechanical brainless robots. And indeed their brains had nothing in them other than thoughts of killing. The leaders are so proud and the girls are thrilled at the sight of these brainless killers.

18. They were continuously trained in killing people, not necessarily enemy soldiers. There were elite troops, equipped with the best weapons, and trained to kill in the most hideous ways. They were taught how to creep up to an unsuspecting victim and slit his throat. There was no thought about the victim being as his attacker, most likely with wife and children, brothers and sisters. There was no thought that a moment ago he was alive and breathing, just like his attacker. He must be killed because he was the enemy.

19. These elite forces troops invariably undergo a psychological cange. They became killers, pitiless killers. They look forward to wars so they can put their killing skills into practise.

20. But for years there may be no war. They retire and try to take up civilian life. But they are trained murderers. The forces have released murderers in the midst of ordinary people.

21. They will find difficulty to adjust. Hardened and trained to look at killings as a vocation, they either become criminals, murderers or psychopaths.

22. Those soldiers who had to serve on the war front, fighting and killing and witnessing the horrors and becoming immune to the sufferings of others cannot but become psychopaths also. They would find difficulty to adjust to civilian life. They may become mentally deranged.

23. In todays war waged by the U.S. the soldiers may be exposed to radiation, if not from nuclear explosions, perhaps from handling shells etc coated with depleted uranium. They will suffer from radiation sicknesses, from cancer.

24. The people who sent these young people to fight their wars will be safe. They will eat well, drink well, and enjoy life’s luxuries. It is the young who will suffer, who will pay the ultimate price.

25. The novelists, the television and film producers will concoct glorious stories of war and heroes. It does not matter if they are blatant lies. It is good for making money. The U.S. lost the war in Vietnam but on the cinema and TV screens Rambo would single-handedly defeat the whole Vietnamese army. And the Americans and their allies just love it. They would feel so proud seeing the exploits of Rambo on the screen.

 26. And youngsters would be taken in with the pictorial glory depicted and would be persuaded to join the killers in the armed forces, to gloriously kill and wound the enemies.

27. The leaders of the countries with the finest team of killers equipped with the best arms would not hesitate to send their young people to their death based on fabricated lies. That was what happened in Iraq. But the people of these countries re-elected these liars so they may continue to send the cream of their young people to their death.

28. That is what war really is – not a glorious struggle for democracy and human rights, but merely to satisfy the crazy ambitions of lying leaders of the powerful countries. In the old days leaders and generals lead from the front. The cowardly leaders of today stay clear thousands of miles from the front, sipping wine and gorging themselves on the finest food.

29. Even as we talk here, wars are going on in several places initiated by the bullies of the world. People are being killed and maimed. We need to make quick progress with the criminalisation of war.

30. It will not be easy of course. William Wilberforce spent 20 long years to get the British Parliament to outlaw slave trading nearly 300 years ago. But slave trading is nothing compared to the killings and the breaches of basic human rights in modern war. This is not to say that slavery and slave trading are less heinous than war. But the struggle against war is far more serious because every day newer killing machines are being invented by the rich and powerful in order to kill more people. And the urge to try out these machines is very strong.

31. Actually, these new weapons are bankrupting the nations of the world. To recover the cost of research, development and production these advanced countries are selling their weapons to countries which can ill afford them.

32. As soon as the weapons are sold to the poor, newer weapons would be invented or the previous weapons would be modified and updated. Then the arms salesmen would come again. If a country refuses to buy, a neighbouring country would be persuaded to buy. Then the salesmen would return to the first country and broadly hint that if it does not buy then its forces would be inferior to its neighbours.

33. Even if the countries are not at war with each other, their military personnel would feel unhappy if they cannot have the new toys. And so money that the poor can ill-afford would flow to the rich countries. As the weapons are upgraded and newer weapons invented the flow of money to the rich would become a deluge. The poor will get even poorer.

34. The worst part is that the poor countries will probably have no occasion to use the sophisticated weapons. Yet they have to be maintained at high cost while they give no returns at all to the poor nations.

35. The arms trade is destroying the economies of many poor countries. Yet the exporting countries are not benefitting either. They have to continue investing in research and development of newer and efficient killing machines. The cost will mount and keep mounting as the new technologies and innovative designs require even more sophistication and expensive material. And if the powerful countries go to war, as America has done in Iraq, the cost to the country is mind-boggling. The cost of the war in Iraq for the U.S. is estimated by Joseph Stiglitz the Nobel Laureate to be more than US$ 3 trillion dollars so far. It is going to go on gulping more and more money. Even the U.S. cannot afford to lose this amount of money, especially when victory has not and will not be achieved. Imagine what we can do for the poor and the sick of the world with just a fraction of the 3 trillion.

36. And the whole world is suffering also. Everyone has to spend more money on security, air travel is no longer safe, and lots of money have to be expanded on checking the so-called Muslim terrorists. Far from war against Iraq resulting in the spread of democracy in the Middle East, it has brought about the spread of instability and insecurity to the whole world.

 37. War is truly not an option in this modern world. The militarily powerful such as the US and European countries cannot win any war, their sophisticated and costly weapons notwithstanding. This is because the defeat of the enemy, no matter how weak, will not end in victory for the winner. The Governments may surrender and sign a peace treaty but the people will not. They will continue to fight with whatever means they have. Bitter over their countries’ defeat and occupation they will not stop fighting.

38. Against these people all the modern weapons, the helicopter gunships, missiles, bombs, rockets, stealth aircrafts and jet fighters, special forces, tanks, warships are quite useless. Once in a while the nationalists might get lucky and destroy a multi-million dollar aircraft and tank.

39. In Vietnam the powerful U.S. military was soundly thrashed by pyjama-clad Viet peasants until the U.S. ran away helter-skelter. In Afghanistan the Taliban successfully confined the NATO forces to certain towns only. In Baghdad, the American and British forces have achieved none of the objectives. Killing Saddam had not resulted in ending the war. “Shock and Awe” have not overawed the Iraqis and forced them into submitting.

40. Surge and new forces have cost more money and more deaths of U.S. soldiers, more mental diseases amongst them with no sign of bringing the war to an end or making Iraq a successful democracy.

41. The rich countries may come up with all kind of costly weapons capable of killing more people efficiently but all these weapons will not win wars against the people determined to fight and preserve their independence.

42. Perhaps the weapons, including nuclear weapons can be employed in a war amongst the militarily powerful. Perhaps they cab be used by the U.S. and Britain against Russia and China. They may be able to pulverize these countries but these countries would also wreak havoc in the aggressor countries. In fact the whole world will be destroyed by war between the powerful countries.

43. The rich and militarily powerful countries should take note of this. All their money, weapons and tactical skills will avail them of nothing. They will lose fighting against the countries weaker than them, and they will suffer death and destruction if they fight against countries which can match their military capability. In the end, they would still achieve nothing.

44. Clearly war is no longer an option, not just because of the massive death and destruction that modern weaponry can inflict but also because the cost of war has gone up so much that even rich countries like the U.S. can be bankrupted. As Joseph Stiglitz has computed the war in Iraq has so far cost the US $ 3 trillion dollars. The U.S. is bankrupt and this war will prevent the U.S. from ever settling its debts. Of course it can just not pay. That is the prerogative of the strong. The belief that the might is right still holds.

45. But as I pointed out, because of the virtual arms race caused by the high pressure sales tactics by arms salesmen, other countries have also become financial strapped. Indeed the whole world is now heading for financial disaster partly because of investing in ever more sophisticated and ever more costly arms. And for what? They are never going to win any war with these weapons.

46. The rise in oil prices are connected with war. And oil prices affect the process of all goods. In other words, the increase in oil prices brings about inflation. The poor of this world will be the ones most affected. But the rich will suffer also. We are seeing this happening now.

47. The wars will be clearly bankrupt the world. And yet the wars will solve none of the problems of humanity, none of the conflicts between nations. The cost in human lives and property is literally killin

48. Looked at from any angle, war is a great waste of everything. So why are we still going to war? Why are we still killing people and destroying wealth when we are not getting anything from our wars?

49. We claim to be civilized. How civilized is a society where duels and killings are legally accepted as a way of settling quarrels. Would justice be served when the winner usually is the one skilled in killing? The end result must be a society of killers

<!–[if !supportLists]–>50. <!–[endif]–>Yet war between nations is actually duel on a grand scale. Seventy million people were killed in the Second World War. Property that was worth trillions of dollars were destroyed. The Allies proclaimed the winners. But what have the winners got to show for all these? Was justice served? Were the people killed brought back to life? Was the huge sums of money expended recovered? Was there any profit for anyone?

<!–[if !supportLists]–>51. <!–[endif]–>The answer to all these questions must be resounding “NO”. No one gained anything from war. Everyone lost. And the cost in human suffering is inmeasurable.

<!–[if !supportLists]–>52. <!–[endif]–>We cannot claim to be civilized when we kill and destroy in order to prove how right we are or how just and fair we are.

<!–[if !supportLists]–>53. <!–[endif]–>How long more are going to do this? We are already capable of destroying the whole world. Must we wait until we do this before we stop, before we declare wars as illegal and the people who initiate wars as criminals? By that time you must agree it would be too late. War must be stopped now. War must be regarded as a crime. The people and especially their leaders who resort to war in order to settle disputes between them and others must be regarded as criminals, must be made to face charges in a court of law and be punished appropriately. Until then let us not claim that we are civilised.

<!–[if !supportLists]–>54. <!–[endif]–>I say criminalize war and punish the leaders and the people who resort to war in order to settle disputes with other countries.

 

End

 

<!–[if !supportLists]–>

 

Published in: on April 26, 2008 at 01:53  Comments (16)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://bigdogdotcom.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/expose-war-crimes-criminalise-war/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

16 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. wow u r really fast. i think the talk ended just 5 minutes ago. wanted to go but found out that at the last minute they decided to open it to IC students only. dont know why though.

  2. So far one of the best speech against the super powers since Tun M step down as PM, the one and only standing tall Malay… May Allah bless u Tun and way forward…(,”)

    SAY NO TO NWO!!!

  3. This is a very good speech, one that should be heard far and wide.

  4. […] M: Criminalize war Found this on BigDog’s blog, Dr Mahathir’s speech in Imperial College, London, touching on war issues. Good speech, in my […]

  5. Tell The Pak M, (not fit to be addressed Tun) an
    enbodiment of everything that is down-right evil, to
    expose his own crimes while in office in order for the
    country to move on.

  6. TDM was in top form. Awebl**dysome! 😀

  7. As always, Tun delivered an excellent speech which this time round
    – in defense of those who innocently suffer daily from the ramifications of present day wars;
    – that those “war criminals” who hypocritically crusades in the name of Greater Freedom and Liberty in the world would be disgusted to listen; Tun continues to be a “marked” statesman of his perpetual enemies at the international level who in the name of global peace and freedom continuously and viciously rape and plunder the world’s resources for their personal gains
    – his historical enemies in his own country will still refuse and cannot accept Tun for the great man he is

    Thus in that country that advocates freedom of speech, “scores of Malaysians and non-Malaysians were left stranded outside the Imperial College when they were barred from entering the hall” reported the Star. Who’s responsible? These are indeed the works of “scavengers” who fear the Tun to speak his mind without fear and favor. I wonder what would have the turn been out if he would have given such a speech at Hyde Park.

    Syabas again, Tun.

  8. You have my highest respect Tun. Thank you (on behalf our the people of the world – whether they realize it or not).

  9. This must be the best speech on Peace & Humanitarian ever, by any leader, and of all time.

    The part where he elaborated on the sufferings of casualties makes me feel sick to the bones. We should all feel responsible.

    This should not be left as just “a speech”. I hope and pray that justice be served.

  10. The good doctor may have a good idea, but he also has mislead his audience in part with the following statement:

    “In todays war waged by the U.S. the soldiers may be exposed to radiation, if not from nuclear explosions, perhaps from handling shells etc coated with depleted uranium. They will suffer from radiation sicknesses, from cancer”

    No soldier has been exposed to a nuclear explosion since testing in the 60’s nor is one likely to be since there are no more battlefield nuclear weapons and that foolish concept was shelved. There also are no shells coated with depleted uranium. A shell is a hollow metal form filled with explosive. DU has been used for only one purpose, to kill tanks. To do that, a thin metal rod is fired at high velocity. The metal rod does not explode and the soldier handling that ammunition does not touch the metal rod. There have been some claims of cancer, but most are not due to DU and those few that the Board of Veterans Claims granted were done on the “benefit of the doubt” meaning the veteran could not really prove their case, but the government did not have enough information to dispute it either. 237 out of something like 500,000 documents filed with the board from 1992 to 2008 had the words “depleted uranium” in them and most of those were not found to be valid. Unlike the speculation that abounds on the internet about depleted uranium, these are the facts.

  11. […] to be asked to speak on criminalizing war ?? a subject that needs to be taken up by all civilized pehttps://bigdogdotcom.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/expose-war-crimes-criminalise-war/News & Star The News and StarA MAN has been charged with strangling his uncle to death in Carlisle. […]

  12. […] to be asked to speak on criminalizing war ?? a subject that needs to be taken up by all civilized pehttps://bigdogdotcom.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/expose-war-crimes-criminalise-war/French Laundry named again as top-5 in the world Napa Valley RegisterOnce again, The French Laundry, […]

  13. […] to be asked to speak on criminalizing war ?? a subject that needs to be taken up by all civilized pehttps://bigdogdotcom.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/expose-war-crimes-criminalise-war/U. S. Army Officer Candidate School &amp Hall of Fame – Google Books Resultby Turner Publishing […]

  14. In every high school of all countries should make this speech a must to read for the students if we want to survive next 100 years.
    There is no doubd at all all the western countries USA & Israel is the promoter of dead and killing innocents to settle disputes.
    I WILL KILL YOUR PEOPLE INDISCRIMINATLY IF YOU DON’T GIVE WHAT I WANT.
    With this mentality how can we look forward next 100 years to stay alive & civilised ?
    Milosevich & other war criminals has been brought to justice so whats the difference between Milosevich and Bush,Howard,Rumsfeld Blair and others,can anyone respond to me on this one?
    If this war criminals not tried in Hagg how can we expect to heal & reconsile after maybe million or more people been killed?

    It is an inconviniant truth hanging in the air.

    Someone has to deal with this and maybe we all start doing something now.

  15. The truth is about to reveal itself. Dr Mahathir has reawakened a world that is in slumber. And just recently Jimmy Carter told the world that Israel has over 150 nuclear heads, yet Iran is been maltreated because it is pursuing a peaceful nuclear programme. But come to think of it, why is it so difficult to believe the truth?

  16. Current Afghan and Iraq wars stem from the decision of Israel’s founders to take Palestinian land by armed force rather than peaceful purchase as was authorized by the British in their Balfour Declaration. Israel’s Zionists have been able to get away with the land theft by having their duals abroad take an active role in national politics and generously fund the election campaigns of candidates who go along with Israel’s crimes against Palestinians. American politicians, as well as British, have become so dependent on this campaign as well as Zionist-controlled media support that they not only have deployed military forces against Israel’s Afghan and Iraqi enemies but the US Congress has just granted Israel another $2.2-billion in foreign aid which Israel claims it uses to buy US weapons (with which it suppresses Palestinians). Thus it’s not enough to put on trial for war crimes leaders like Blair and Bush and all the others taking part in these illegal wars when the actual culprit is hiding in the woodpile or under the skirt of anti-Semetism.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: