True colours spokenth

The mindset of Opposition Leaders of being Anti Constitution is clearly unravelling bit-by-bit. The latest is from nepotisismee PKR Vice President Nurul Izzah Anwar, over on Saturday in Petaling Jaya.

Her statement against the inhibitive restrictions of Malays to apostate out of Islam, has received a lot of flak. Even HRH Sultan of Selangor voices his displeasure on the matter.

Mais: Sultan of Selangor regrets statement by Nurul Izzah

SHAH ALAM, Nov 6 Nov 6 — The Sultan of Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah has expressed regret and surprise at the statement made by Parti Keadilan Rakyat vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar last Saturday that Muslim Malays are free to choose their religion under the religious freedom factor.

The chairman of the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (Mais) Datuk Setia Mohamad Adzib Mohd Isa said His Highness totally rejected any view that the Malay Muslims were free to choose other religion and denounce Islam.

“As the advisor to the Sultan of Selangor, Mais will continue to be firm in assisting him to be cautious, sensitive and firm on anyone who directly or indirectly challenges the sanctity of Islam whether in terms of ideology or practice, particularly in Selangor,” he said in a statement, here today.

He said this when commenting on the report by an opposition news portal that Nurul Izzah, at the forum “Islamic State: Which Version; Who Is Responsible”, in Subang Jaya last Saturday, had said that every citizen in this country should not be forced to practice any particular religion.

However yesterday, after being criticised by various quarters, Nurul Izzah had issued a statement in her “Facebook” denying that she supported apostasy.

Adzib said the Council feared that such a statement could confuse and influence Muslim Malays in the state of Selangor as it was issued by a senior leader of a component party of the Opposition pact which administered the state.

He pointed out that based on Islamic teachings, religious freedom was only applicable to non-Muslims who were free to embrace Islam without any coercion.

“However, after embracing Islam, they cannot freely choose other religions and denounce Islam.

“The same goes for the Malay Muslims who cannot choose other religions freely and denounce Islam because they must abide by all Islamic teachings as professed by Prophet Muhammad,” he said.

Adzib said Islam was also a condition that determined the status of a Malay as provided for by Article 160(2) of the Federal Constitution.

Thus, he said, the liberalism or pluralism thinking was very dangerous because this would erode the rights and privileges of the Malays as provided for in the Constitution and existing law.

“His Highness the Sultan of Selangor also said that matters pertaining to Islam should not be turned into a polemic and made into political capital for the benefit of certain parties because this could confuse and deviate the thinking of Muslims on Islam.

“Mais stands firm that any agenda or action that is politically oriented should not forsake the position, thinking and implementation of Islam in Selangor, in particular, and Malaysia in general.

“Nevertheless, Mais has directed the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) to carry out an investigation for appropriate action.”

Meanwhile, Puteri Umno head Datuk Rosnah Abdul Rashid Shirlin advised Nurul Izzah to retract her statement on the issue and to repent and seek Allah’s forgiveness for having made the statement.

Rosnah said Nurrul Izzah’s statement carried very significant implication especially to the younger generation as it paved the way for other movements to deviate the faith of Muslims.

“Puteri UMNO wants to see the top leadership of PAS, especially the PAS Women’s wing, to state their stand on Nurul Izzah’s statement,” she said in a statement.

In KUALA TERENGGANU, the general secretary of “Gagasan Pendidikan Melayu Malaysia” (Gagasan), Syed Anuar Syed Mohamad urged the National Fatwa Council to respond immediately to Nurul Izzah’s statement which could confuse the Muslims.

He said the PKR top leadership must issue a statement and state its stand on the issue and whether the statement issued by Nurul Izzah was personal or represented the party’s stand. — Bernama


The Federal Constitution is very clear, about the definition of a Malay (Article 160) and the restriction to profess other religions to a Muslim (Article 11, Section 4).

Nurul, like other Opposition Leaders, take the opportunity in Opposition-friendly intellectual discourses for an anti-Federal Constitutional position. This is part of the ‘Politics of Hatred’ strategy. Particularly when they can manipulate issues which are pro-majority and provided clearly in the Federal Constitution as being ‘oppressive’, especially when its used against the minority.

The Malays are the majority of Malaysians and mainstay of political power. To downplay the bond that binds the Malays together, like Islam, position of HRH Rulers and Malay customs, and the identity that defines the Malays, would be the achilles heel to destruct the Malay power made formidable due to the unity.

The Opposition would not able to grasp power from the mandate of the majority. This is because, they don’t have a fresh ideas for the development agenda to bring about progress for the majority. Their power-base for support had always been from the minority. Obviously, the minority which is apsiring for power do not have the interest of the majority in their agenda.

In short, they as the minority want to impose their will against the interests and aspirations of the majority.

The attack against the restriction of apostasy for Muslims, means that its strategic to un-define the characteristics of the Malays. Tactically, they are hoping that the implementation of  Article 11.4 be laxed and more and more Muslims could be prosetylised, as per what JAIS formally uncovered on the 6 Aug 2011 raid on Damansara Utama Methodist Church.

The moment more and more Muslims be prosetylised, then they could demonstrate how the Government has failed on the downtrodden Malays and the churches and NGOs step in, to cover for the void.

Nurul Izzah, the heir-apparent to the leadership of the party which was created and formed around and for the purpose of her father, former abuse-of-power-convict and Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim, did attack the ‘unfairness’ for laws against LGBT. Section 377 (A) and (B) prohibits of un-natural sexual intercourse, which her sexually deviant father has been charged twice for the same sodomy offense (with different persons). This is part of their strategy to weaken the Malays.

HRH Sultan of Selangor takes the position, statements and actions of the Opposition very seriously. Previously, as far back as 2009 he sounded out against the PKR Government under Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim’s intention to utilize the monies in the zakat and Baitul Mal coffer for development purposes. How the Chinese reacted against the ‘Kalimah Allah’ issue also attracted HRH’s attention.

When DAP MP for Serdang Teo Nie Ching spoke in the surau and being ‘under-dressed’ in her constituency three Ramadhans ago, HRH Sultan of Selangor was angered. Then, another titah against the displeasure of activities in DUMC. And now, Nurul Izzah’s statement, which was made in Petaling Jaya, Selangor.

Malaysians should take very serious notice on all these statements made by HRH Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah Ibni Almarhum Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah of Selangor. PKR Government under Khalid has proven to not augur well with HRH Sultan of Selangor.

The attack has been consistent against the Full Monty; Islam, HRH Rulers and the Malays’ customs, traditions and values. . The majority should reject the Opposition. It is everything against what this nation stood for.

The true colours spokenth. It is bold. It is scarlet.

Published in: on November 6, 2012 at 22:50  Comments (9)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

9 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Kenapa Sultan Selangor dan MUIS sebok dengan Nurul dikatakan membuat kenyataan menyokong kebebasan Ugama.Belum tentu ia membuat kenyataan itu dan ia telah menafikan sakerasnya.

    Bagaimana pula dengan President MCA Chua Soo Lek yang membuat kenyataan menghina Islam dan mempertikaikan hukum Hudud.Kenapa tiada Sultan atau Pemimpin ang menegornya.Sakuang nya kita membuat Kenyataan yang orang kair tidak berhak untok bercakap mengenai hukum Al Quran ang ia sendiri tidak faham.Bukan kah ini satu pebghinaan kapada orang Melayu ang berugama Islam.

    Kenapa orang Sekarang,terutamanya tidak akutnkapada hukum Allah.Mungkin keran mereka tidak nampak Allah dan tidak dapat gambarkan bentok api neraka.

    Kita boleh berpolitik,tapi biarlah ada hadnya.Soal ugama tidaklah payah senoh lebeh lebeh laigi bai kita yang tiada tidak mempunyai asa yang kukoh.

    • Chua Soi Lek persoalkan Hudud PAS. Hudud PAS bukan Islamik pun. Kerajaan PAS Kelantan dah bawa ke DUN Kelantan dan diluluskan pada 1993. Namun Kerajaan PAS Kelantan sendiri tidak mewartakan Hudud PAS Kelantan ini.

      Ini kenyataan rasmi Chua Soi Lek mengenai isu Hudud PAS


      1. Saya ingin merujuk kepada fitnah permainan politik Pakatan Rakyat berhubung dengan isu pendirian MCA berkaitan dengan perjuangan Enakmen Hudud PAS bahawa kononnya MCA menghina Islam dengan menyebarkan ideologi Islamofobia.

      2. Saya telah berbincang dengan Ustaz Fathul Bari dari Pertubuhan Ilmuan Malaysia dan tidak ada masalah bagi MCA untuk menerima penerangan dari beliau tentang hukum hudud berdasarkan sumber-sumber Islam yang sebenar.

      3. Ingin saya tegaskan di sini bahawa, ketika MCA bangkit untuk menentang perjuangan Enakmen Hudud versi PAS, MCA sebenarnya tidak menghina agama Islam kerana tindakan MCA mempertikaikan perjuangan sesebuah parti politk ( PAS ) adalah berbeza dengan penentangan MCA terhadap sesuatu agama ( Islam ). Isu ini sebenarnya telah dipolitikkan dan diputar oleh pemimpin Pakatan Rakyat apabila mereka menganggap sesebuah parti politik ( PAS ) itu adalah agama Islam.

      4. Saya seringkali menyatakan bahawa pendirian politik Pakatan Rakyat selalunya konsisten untuk tidak konsisten. Dahulu Pengerusi DAP iaitu Karpal Singh sendiri bangkit mempersoalkan Sultan Perak,Sultan Azlan Shah mengenai campur tangan istana dalam isu pertukaran Pengarah Jabatan Agama Islam Perak (JAIP) dan Istana seharusnya bebas daripada sebarang penglibatan politik. Namun begitu , dalam isu pertikaian MCA terhadap Hudud versi PAS pula Pakatan RAKYAT hendak melibatkan Yang di Pertuan Agong demi memenuhi hawa nafsu dan kepentingan politik mereka sendiri.

      5. Sekirannya Pakatan Rakyat benar–benar konsisten untuk memperjuangkan keadilan demi agama dan umat Islam, maka mengapa mereka hanya berdiam diri apabila pemimpin DAP iaitu Ngeh Koo Ham dalam tweetnya yang jelas menunjukkan beliau menghina dan memperlekehkan Islam apabila beliau menyatakan protest umat Islam terhadap Sam Bacile adalah satu perkara yang terlalu membazir masa dan tenaga. Peliknya juga dalam isu penghinaan Islam oleh pemimpin DAP ini mendapat ramai pemimpin PAS yang keluar menyokong dan mempertahankan beliau.

      6. Selain itu, kami telah bersama menuntut kemerdekaan negara dan membangunkan negara hingga ke tahap ini. Tidak pernah sekalipun MCA melakukan sesuatu tindakan yang mengecam Agama Islam dan pengamalannya di Malaysia.

      7. Sepertimana MCA menghormati agama-agama lain seperti Buddha, Kristian dan Hindu, MCA juga peka dan menghormati sensitiviti umat Islam negara ini, apatah lagi, Islam adalah agama rasmi persekutuan.

      8. Hal ini terbukti dengan sokongan dan penerimaan MCA terhadap perlaksanaan Rukun-rukun Islam di negara ini seperti pembinaan masjid-masjid, institusi Tabung Haji yang memudahkan umat Islam menunaikan haji, penubuhan dan implementasi pusat zakat dan kutipannya, pembinaan sekolah-sekolah Agama, perbankan Islam, penerapan dasar-dasar Islam dalam kerajaan dan yang paling utama, MCA tidak pernah menentang malah menyokong dan mendokong bahawa Islam adalah Agama Persekutuan dengan agama-agama lain bebas diamalkan dengan aman dan damai seperti yang termaktub dalam Perlembagaan Malaysia sejak Merdeka.

      9. Rakyat perlu tahu pada Pilihan Raya Umum 1986, Mursyidul Am Pas, Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat yang ketika itu Pesuruhjaya Pas Kelantan telah mengeluarkan manifesto antara lain pelaksanaan undang-undang Islam turut berkuat kuasa ke atas orang bukan Islam. Manifesto PAS 1986 dalam muka surat lima menguatkuasakan undang-undang Islam di seluruh negeri dengan tidak meletakkan perbezaan atas sebab-sebab berlainan keturunan, bangsa, agama dan pangkat kecuali perkara berhubung dengan ibadat dan undang-undang kekeluargaan. “Dalam muka surat 24 pula dinyatakan bahawa hak-hak orang bukan Islam sama sahaja di sisi undang-undang jenayah dan sivil dengan orang-orang Islam dan ini adalah hudud sebenar berlandaskan Islam. Oleh itu, dalam sesebuah Negara yang demokratik maka MCA hendak menyeru Pakatan Rakyat supaya meletak kembali Hudud sebagai salah satu manifesto mereka dalam pilihan raya akan datang ( PR 13 ) sepertimana PAS meletak manifesto Hudud terhadap bukan Islam pada pilihan raya 1986 demi menghormati dan menjunjung prinsip demokrasi.

    • Atiff
      From your written language, I gather you must be non muslim and non malay and doesnt even know anything about Islam, Malay, and Tanah Melayu.Thus,your point is invalid!Get lost from Malaysia.

    • Hudud versi PAS kata, liwat isteri dibolehkan. Liwat orang lain yang tak boleh. Take beeeeeeeer !!

  2. This wannabe politician should refrain from issues that is not within her jurisdiction. Her immaturity clearly shows her being manipulated by the loud minority.

    If she aims to please a certain segment of society, then she has to face the backlash of the majority. Penny wise pound foolish.

    Her trip to see Estrada also reveals her mentality – family first, country, religion and race rank last . To date whatever she has expressed truly shows she is a green horn, still wet behind her ears.

  3. YB Nurul & bonda beliau pernah mengesahkan bahawa jam tangan omega kontroversi kepunyaan ayahanda berada di dalam pegangan mereka.

    Sehingga ke saat ini, bayang jam kontroversi tersebut pun belum pernah ditampilkan dan ditunjuk kepada rakyat.

    Bukankah amat sesuai dan amat berpatutan bagi YB Nurul untuk menunjukkan jam omega tersebut untuk menolak segala tohmahan dan menutup aib ayahanda serta pada masa yang sama boleh membuktikan yang YB Nurul bercakap benar.

    Kalau YB Nurul tidak bercakap benar mengenai jam omega, mungkin juga beliau tidak berkata benar mengenai perkara ini.

    Siakap Senohong Gelama Ikan Duri
    Cakap Bohong Nanti Tak Leh Jadi Anak Perdana Menteri

  4. The anti- Federal Consitution elements should know that if they can’t honour the Consti then they certainly should rethink if they want to continue to stay in this country. Their behaviour will only create instability and divisions among the people that maybe difficult to heal. Dont ever try to open a pandora’s box lest you wouldnt know how to close it.

    • History Professor Emeritus Tan Sri Khoo Kay Kim said those who do not like this country (belittling the Malaysian flag etc at Marina Chin Himpun Merdeka) “berhijrah lah”.

      I say those who do not respect and live by the Constitution of the country “berambus lah”.

  5. […] Without doubt, there is an international ring of support which suspiciously include the international church organisations to support the ‘Politics of Hatred’ strategy by some deviant minority in this country. This is not withstanding that HRH Rulers’s own titah against freedom of interpreting Christianity towards Malay-Muslims. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: