Institut Wayang

Institut Rakyat

Institut Rakyat

PKR is trying to formalize their thoughts, policies and strategies. After years of hoodwinking the rakyat by making sensational but empty and impractical meaningless promises, they have decided to get their act together in the last round before 13GE. This afternoon, Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim launched PKR’s think-tank.

PKR unveils think-tank to help make better policies

Koh Jun Lin • Feb 21, 13 7:24PTG

PKR has launched its new think-tank today with the aim to help them make policies that are “directed towards social justice and a sustainable future”.

In addition, it would also run programmes to educate youths on being more effective in their activism.

The think-tank, dubbed ‘Institut Rakyat’, featured many prominent thinkers in its eight-member advisory panel.

These include former UN Research Institute for Social Development board member and economist Jomo Kwame Sundaram, constitutional law expert Azmi Sharom, Malaysia CEO of the Year 2010 award winner Stanley Thai, and media professor Zaharom Nain.

“They are the ones, with their expert advice, professional experience, intellectualism and scholarly experience, who will give directions to the think tank,” said Institut Rakyat director Wong Hoy Cheong.

“We need evidence-based policies, not policies that are created, and then followed by ‘evidence’ pulled out of thin air to support it.”

Other notable figures in the institute include suspended Bank Islam economist Azrul Azwar Ahmad Tajudin who serves as the institute’s research consultant, and former Maybank CEO Wan Azmi Wan Hamzah who serves as a director.

The institute is chaired by PKR president Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail and her deputy Syed Husin Ali, a former senator.

Although PKR-linked, Wong said the institute is dependent on donations from well-wishers and does not receive any funding from neither the party nor any government.

‘Offering critical analysis and commentary’

Meanwhile, the PKR de facto leader said the institute would be independent despite its relationship with his party during his keynote speech at the launch event in Subang.

“The paramount role of a policy studies institute is to offer critical analysis and commentary in order to influence them to meet the requirements of good governance.

“The establishment of this institute, being affiliated with PKR, grants the risk of being reduced to a self-serving mouthpiece.

“Hence it is of the greatest consequence that it should be independently run and that it performs the task it is set out to do in its charter, which among others is to advise and critique without fear or favour.

“To remain true to this, it must listen to the voice of the people. It must promote the culture of separation between the ruling political coalition from the government – and I am anticipating an imminent victory, God willing,” Anwar (right) said.

He added that young leaders in the party have long lobbied with the party’s ‘old guard’ for a party-linked think tank just as other parties have done, but with freedom to do its own research.

“This is a rather unique event in my political experience, which is that I have to succumb to the pressure of the youth from time to time to create new institutes and new ideas,” he said while thanking those involved in the lobbying.

****************

It is called ‘Institut Rakyat’ (IR). It is filled with odd balls, invariably would be at odds against each other. The any other Opposition’s attempt to get different interest groups and stakeholders to sit down and formulate a common stand on anything, the consultation process would eventually turn out to be some sort of  worthy to be a pig’s swill. Each interest groups’ raison d’être would invariably contradict each other.

The board of directors BOD) consist of mixed personalities with adverse specialities. The Chairperson is an opthamologist without any other relevant working experience but the hospital, far from in any corporation, economic or macro planning level. Politically, she played the role of a ‘puppet’ when he husband was in jail and they needed to formalise the ‘Reformasi’ movement into a political organisation.

Dr Syed Husin Ali is a sociologist, with socialism and social justice in mind. Where as Wong Hoy Cheong is a performance artist.

The economic expert recently was sacked for conduct unbecoming of a bank employee and now being investigated for commercial crime information theft.  The corporate man who sits in the BOD once got into a lot of debt trouble with his property venture Land and General Bhd.

The economic academician sitting as advisory panel Dr Jomo K Sundram was once a strong critique of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad when the latter was the Fourth Prime Minister. However, he approved of Tun Dr Mahathir’s radical ‘Capital Control’ economic program which not only stopped the economy from sliding far worse from the effects of attack on Ringgit Malaysia in 1997-8, but turned the economy around within the next three years.

The several theoretical lawyers sit in the BOD and advisory panel. It is interesting what sort of proposed revision of the Federal Constitution that this IR would come up with, especially this is a deeply rooted politically backed think-tank body.

This IR would not be ‘an independent think-tank’. It is likely IR would be a conduit from the monies that needed the ‘cleaning cycle’ channeled from economic activities by cronies’ corporations in Selangor and Pulau Pinang.  Some of these activities are ‘below radar’.

This is not withstanding ‘donations’ as CSR programs by generous corporations from abroad especially countries in the region. Personalities like George Soros comes to mind instantly.

There are also specific foreign bodies backed by Neo Con Jews and camouflaged as NGOs to promote international democracy such as International Republican Institute, National Endownment for Democracy or National Democratic Institute  which gladly come in droves to fund any effort to topple a government which they are unable to over-power or influence.

The fact is that PKR has failed even at policy level all these while. Anwar’s economic agenda is about hoodwinking the rakyat just to win support and votes, from sensationalization and dramatization of senseless ‘economic reforms’. An example is reducing the retail prices of petrol and diesel, at the times where crude hydrocarbon is hitting sky-high record breaking prices.

In his ‘Politics of Hatred’ strategy and getting the ‘student power revolt’, Anwar wanted to write-off the RM 18 b PTPTN student loans and fully subsidize tertiary education. To capture the imagination of the young Malaysians, they wanted to completely abolish import tax and excise for cars. Both would just spiral the problems related to the young people further.

This IR is nothing but an election ploy and gimmick. The members would contradict themselves and expect to streamlining more senseless policies. Examples are the Buku Jingga and the Opposition 2013 Budget. They talk about spending and making sensational ‘offerings for the rakyat’ but without clearly outlining how the source to finance all these ‘giveaways’ are from.

Most importantly, the sustainability of these economically-bankrupt ‘give aways’.

PKR have been known to make promises that they are unable to keep. Such as the various assistance for Selangorians if ever they come to power in their 12GE manifesto such as free 20cubic metres of water, cash subsidies for single mothers, new borns and the hard core poors and others.

Talam-gate

 

It is unimaginable how they would fair with their economic and financial policies. They failed in Selangor, even though the state is the wealthiest and most productive in the Federation. Malaysians should not forget the RM 1b Talam-gate scandal. The fact is that Anwar who inherited a bullish economy was a failed Finance Minister. Dr. Jomo’s economic thoughts for a practical economy is another ‘financial fairy tale’.

It is no brainer to second guess where the axis of their foreign policy. They would formulate justification to support the ‘security of State of Israel which is essence of  two-state-solution’, taking the same stand as the West in the rebellion in Syria and would urge Malaysia to take active military role in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Don’t expect too much from the results of their thoughts on law and social justice except for anguish and fury from the majority. They would eventually come up with fancy justification to be pro-LGBT, pro-apostasy and pro-anti monarchy. Neither on governance when issues such as Kuala Semesta indiscriminate sand mining in Kuala Langat.

In the final analysis, there would be no progressive goodies for the human development program for young Malaysians. In the past five years, they did not do anything to alleviate the unemployment issues especially in the graduates. They didn’t even do any academic reforms in tertiary institution that they are in control such as Unisel. Nor did they do any youth upskilling programs, especially certified semi professional and professional training for youths, students and graduates.

Expect works that would insult the majority for all their proposed media and arts programs. Neither Anwar nor Wan Azizah is truthful when they are stuck and had to face the media.  They simply attack the media when they are trapped. Like the ‘Omega-Chinadoll’ scandal. As political dictators, Anwar is known for his gag orders. Since his Deputy Prime Minister days.

Then again, freedom of expression doesn’t tantamount to works of art that promote LGBT activities nor socially or spiritually sensitive to the majority, even with the excuse to promote creativity. Anwar’s creativity could be reflected from the different stories and lies he tells different groups on people, on their specific interests.

All that sums up to another Wayang Mat King Leather. Just like always. It would sound fancy as a sounding board. Never the less, expect non sustainability. For Anwar & his band of mobstreet-lawless-politicos, ‘rakyat’ is not meant to be served. Its just an excuse to give them power.

Published in: on February 22, 2013 at 09:30  Comments (14)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://bigdogdotcom.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/institut-wayang/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

14 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. In the first place, they have to win.

    Nevertheless, UMNO need to get their act together and garner as many intellectual.

    Next war after cyberwar will be the intellectual war or battle of ideas.

  2. To know who will providing and where it will lean towards- look at the Researchers and then the consultants. Info received will be accordign to elaning of researchers and that is key. The rest are not important – they live on what is fed to them

    • Merdeka Centre “research and poll” findings are always favourable to Anwar’s interests. The Director is Anwar’s buddy.

      Said to be closing down for lack of funds. Wonder whether it’s still bobbling.

  3. ha ha anwar…

    orang ngomong…, anjing gong-gong.

    permatang pauh pun masih lagi di takat lama lagi…

  4. Does that mean pakatan has finally admitted that violence no longer hold any appeal. Therefore they have shifted from riotous street protests to an “intellectual” strategy.

    Independent my foot.

  5. From a real think tank,

    The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), which is part of the respected London-based magazine, “The Economist”, predicts that the Barisan Nasional (BN) will win the 13th General Election (GE13) based on its successful track record, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s reform agenda and his successful economic leadership.
    For international observers, the outcome of the upcoming polls is already clear, that the BN will be victorious, the EIU said. It also said the opposition Pakatan Rakyat has been making “costly promises” to gain power, and these were a big stumbling block.
    On all these counts, PR come a distant second, prompting the EIU to predict BN will be the winner.
    The EIU, a think-tank which offers regular country, industry and risk analysis, said that “it is clearly not feasible” for PR to implement all of its campaign promises. “For example, providing free secondary education would cost the government RM43 billion, while abolishing car duty would cut tax revenue by RM4.6 billion a year,” it said. The EIU pointed out that PR had broken many of its earlier promises, including financial assistance for pre-school education, for university students, senior citizens and the disabled; free healthcare for those over 65; lower property taxes; and assistance for home buyers.
    On all these counts, Pakatan’s populism has remained just hot air.
    In Selangor, for example, BN claimed that PR has implemented only 15% of its 31 election pledges, RM2.4 billion worth, made in its 2008 general election manifesto. “Selangor Mentri Besar Khalid Ibrahim commented that a manifesto is not a promise but conceded that voters may think otherwise,” the EIU noted.
    Compared this with BN’s successful track record in fulfilling its promises, and you have a clear difference in approach. For instance, Najib has promised Penang 20,000 affordable houses and a monorail service to ease traffic congestion, and if BN comes to power in the state, voters can be sure that these plans would be implemented.
    Another key reason for the ruling coalition’s strong morale is the “gravity defying” growth of 5.2 per cent that the country is enjoying under Najib’s leadership, along with a jump in domestic and foreign investments. And to top it all, per capita income hit US$9,700 from US$7,500 in 2010.
    The EIU agrees with the upward trajectory: Growth figures announced yesterday by the Statistics Department showed that the economy accelerated to 6.4 per cent growth in the last quarter of 2012 and supporting the full year growth to expand by 5.6 per cent from 5.1 per cent a year earlier.
    Against such a backdrop, the EIU said: “No wonder the writing is on the wall for PR as it tries to cobble together some opposition unity between its squabbling leaders before the polls.”

    Buat penyokong-penyokong PAS dan KEADILAN, fikirkanlah hari tua dan masa depan anak-anak kita, masih belum terlambat untuk meninggalkan kapal yang dah nak tenggelam …

  6. Think tanks are a dime a dozen these days.

    When political parties set up think tanks, the objectivity and neutrality of these outfits is always open to question. So, too, are their agendas.

    I am reminded that the ex-Bank Islam chief economist made that now-famous (or infamous, depending on your political leanings) at a conference organised by ISEAS (Institute of South East Asian Studies), a Singapore-based think tank.

    I guess that think tanks, to preserve their objectivity and neutrality, would invite opinions and comments from as diverse a milieu as possible. That’s the way it should be.

    As for political parties or movements setting up think tanks, there’s nothing wrong as long as they are clear, transparent and upfront about it and as long as they allow all their research materials, reports etc to be open to criticism.

    There’s no moratorium on ideas, is there?

    • Think tanks are no tanks if they put in rubbish. Rubbish will come out of the tanks.

      However qualified they may be, PhDs, ex-professors etc. If they are Pakatan Rakyat people, the thinking coming out of the tanks will favour Pakatan Rakayat.

      So, we just laugh at their so-called findings.

  7. Pembaca BD yang dihormati,

    Saya tak nampak apa salahnya Pkr menubuhkan badan pemikir yang dibarisi oleh ahli akademik dan anggota koperat. Mungkin ada juga idea baru yg dapat diketengahkan yg bakal membawa kebaikkan untuk semua.

    Buat masa ini tak silap saya Pemandu memanikan peranan tersebut. So dari kita menghentam tanpa sebab biarlah kita tunggu dahulu dan perhalusi cadangan yg bakal dikemukan kelak

    • Kalau di tubuhkan oleh PKR, pendapat dan rumusan yang di keluarkan mesti lah mirip kapada kepentingan PKR dan PR.

      Ongkos yang di keluarkan bagi membiayai tanki pemikiran itu (betul ke terjemahan nya?) tidak akan di sia siakan. Yang di lantik kapada tanki itu mesti sedar mengapa mereka di lantik ke situ. Pahal pun, mereka sudah memang mirip PKR pendiriannya.

      Jadi, sekarang pun kita sudah boleh teka dengan tepat bahawa tanki pemikiran itu akan mengeluarkan pendapat dan rumusan untuk menaikkan imej PKR dan bossnya, Anwar Al Juburi.

  8. Think-tank or wat-tank can be form on-the-fly and also fly-by-night.

  9. Think tank linked to PKR and chaired by a PKR top brass can never be independent, and yes it will be self serving. In reality think tanks merely give inputs for consideration to be incorporated into policies. Policies also draw their sources of inputs from NGOs, lobby groups representing various interests, civil servants, corporate and business entities, religious groups etc, just to name a few. Should the PKR -linked new think tank be the major source of policy recommendations, then Malaysia will have a problem. Any filtering of feedback through one think tank run and chaired by a political party will not be free of manipulations and biases. Best for policies to be sourced from as wide a spectrum of a society as possible and not channelled thru’ a central think tank tong.

    • The (ideal) process flow very well-articulated indeed. And AES implementation is the filterings of all those solicited and elicited feedbacks including from the road users (no, the sarcasm not directed at you, BTW).

    • Agreed, it can never be independent, will not be free of manipulations and biases.

      Whatever paper, findings, proposals, recommendations the think tank produces must be tailored to the interest of PKR.

      I won’t use it as toilet paper coz I’m a Muslim. But I won’t even allow it in the office premises. Anwar, to me, is a divisive and destructive fellow. Enough with his manipulations, lies and broken promises to the rakyat.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: