Chin Peng is an Enemy of the State

A quarter million dollars of bounty on Chin "Butcher of Malaya" Peng, The Straits Times 1 May 1952

A quarter million dollars of bounty on Chin “Butcher of Malaya” Peng, The Straits Times 1 May 1952

“Chin Peng is an enemy of the State” is a decisive titah of HRH Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah Ibni Almarhum Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah of Selangor. Tuanku also issued a stern warning for anyone trying to be funny against national pride and honour, especially for sordid political stunts. This also include the propagation of communism.

Published: Thursday September 26, 2013 MYT 3:02:00 PM
Updated: Thursday September 26, 2013 MYT 4:32:02 PM

Chin Peng is an enemy of the state, says Sultan Sharafuddin


SEMPORNA: Deceased Communist Party of Malaya (CPM) leader Chin Peng is an enemy of the state, said Sultan of Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah.

The Ruler reminded that Chin Peng wanted to turn the country into a communist state.

“Lives of members of the armed forces and policemen were lost, and civilians were killed and suffered as a result of Chin Peng and the communist terrorists’ actions,” he said when visiting the KD Sri Semporna navy base here yesterday (Thursday).

Sultan Sharafuddin, who is also the Royal Malaysian Navy captain-in-chief, expressed hope that Malaysians would learn and understand the nation’s history and not forget its darkest moments during the Emergency.

“Do not trade national pride and honour just for support and popularity,” he said.

Sultan Sharafuddin congratulated the Royal Malaysian Navy for successfully overcoming challenges during Ops Daulat, and called on all security agencies, including the police, armed forces and Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency, to cooperate and remain in constant communication with each other to protect the country.

“I want to remind those who tried to be an enemy and sell out the county to foreign parties to be cautious and to repent so that they do not commit this evil act again,” he said.

Sultan Sharafuddin is on a four-day visit to Sabah, and had visited KD Sri Tawau naval base on Wednesday and will proceed to Lahad Datu and Sandakan after Semporna.

He will be visiting the Danum Valley Conservation Centre, Pulau Bum Bum and Kampung Tanduo, Lahad Datu, as well as the naval staff quarters in Taman Samudera, Sandakan.


The Opposition have demonstrated their anti-Constitution attitude and behaviour by falsely celebrating the Secretary General of Communist Party of Malaya (CPM) Ong Boon Hua or popularly known as Chin “Butcher of Malaya” Peng as a ‘freedom fighter’.

The fact is that Chin “Butcher of Malaya” Peng led a rebellion against Malayans and subjected so many into torment, anguish, pain and suffering, for the atrocities and terror inflicted throughout the 54 years till peace was achieved upon the Hadyaii Accord, 2 December 1989.

DAP MP for Jelutong Jeff Ooi  seen offering prayers at the casket holding Chin "Butcher of Malaya" Peng's reamins in Bangkok

DAP MP for Jelutong Jeff Ooi seen offering prayers at the casket holding Chin “Butcher of Malaya” Peng’s reamins in Bangkok

Opposition Leaders recently travelled to Bangkok to honour the most brutal murderer who led the rebellion that saw tens of thousands of Malayans died and almost equal number of suffer from injuries inflicted by no more than a few thousand CPM rebels. This include hundreds of loyal and honourable servicemen who were maimed and made incapacitated because of the fighting against them.

CPM rebels also inflicted a lot of suffering for the booby-traps and mines installed in the jungles of Peninsular Malaysia.

23 September 2013| last updated at 12:39AM

MP’s wake visit causes stir

 15  2 Google +3  2 0 comments

QUESTION OF LOYALTY: The move by Jeff Ooi to pay his last respects to Chin Peng in Bangkok comes under heavy fire

GEORGE TOWN: THE presence of a Penang DAP member of parliament and another DAP assemblyman’s special assistant at former Communist Party of Malaya secretary-general Chin Peng’s wake in Bangkok caused a stir.

While Jelutong MP Jeff Ooi had made it clear that he had gone to pay his last respects in his personal capacity, critics said it was still an imprudent decision.

Penang Malay Congress president Rahmad Isahak noted that although Ooi had gone in his personal capacity, he was still an elected Malaysian MP.

“This gives rise to the question of loyalty. He is an elected MP here, and he is answerable to Parliament and to the people who voted for him.

“People might query him and make an issue out of his visit.”

Ooi yesterday said he had gone to pay his respects to the 88 year old in his personal capacity “as an avid reader of Malaysian history”.

“I have no feelings as I didn’t live in the age of brutal war against Japanese invaders nor the civil war during the Insurgency.

“But, I do have strong feelings over how the Thai and Malaysian sides respected the 1989 Hatyai Peace Accord which both countries anchored to fruition.

“All parties who participated in ending the civil war must be accorded due respect as peacemakers,” he said when contacted via Facebook.

Ooi had yesterday posted photographs of his trip to pay respects to Chin Peng, on the popular social networking site.

In one of the photographs, Li Hanming, a special assistant to Penang DAP chairman Chow Kon Yeow, was also seen alongside Ooi, paying his last respects to Chin Peng at Wat That Thong Temple.

Chow, when contacted, said Li had also gone to Bangkok in his personal capacity.

“Yes I was aware of Li’s trip. He had gone there in his personal capacity and was neither representing me nor the party.”

Following his death, many leaders have stated that there was no need to honour Chin Peng, who was responsible for the death of thousands during the Emergency period in Malaya decades ago.

Chin Peng, whose real name is Ong Boon Hua, was reported to have died at a hospital in Bangkok on Sept 16 due to old age, a month before his 89th birthday. He was born on Oct 21, 1924 in Sitiawan, Perak.

Meanwhile, Pas president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang, who previously refused to comment and wanted to let the government to make the decision on whether the ashes of Chin Peng should be brought back to Malaysia, sang a different tune yesterday when he questioned the decision that had been made by the government over the matter.

Even though Abdul Hadi did not mention any name, his statement when opening the Tambun Pas Markaz Tarbiyah at Taman Mere in Ipoh clearly referred to the former Communist leader.

He also associated the government’s decision as the decision of Umno and mocked the party as jahil (ignorant) for making such a decision.

“When Muslims from Medina invaded Makkah after the Quraysh breached the Hudaibiyah Treaty, Prophet Muhammad forgave the Quraysh even though they had brought much misery to Muslims.

“Here we find it difficult to forgive even if someone has turned into ashes,” he said. Additional reporting by Roshidi Abu Samah


The authorities are vigilant about attempts to bring back the ashes of Chin “Butcher of Malaya” Peng, to interned in this country. This include the sordid attempt to relive Chin ‘Buthcer of Malaya” Peng’s struggle, to capture the wild imagination of many historically-blind Malaysians as being the ‘True Freedom Fighter’.

Two were detained in Bayan Lepas International Airport as the arrived from Bangkok. Materials celebrating communism and Chin “Butcher of Malaya” were found with them

25 September 2013| last updated at 05:14PM

Two men detained with Chin Peng related items

By Noor Adzman Baharuddin |
219 1 Google +0 0 0 comments

GEORGE TOWN: Police have detained a local man, believed to be a Datuk Seri, and a Hong Kong national after they were found with items related to former Communist Party of Malaya secretary-general Chin Peng at the Bayan Lepas International Airport here on Tuesday night.

Checks later revealed the local, 66, and his male Hong Kong counterpart, 59, had 12 pamphlets, a book and eight compact discs on Ching Peng in two luggages belonging to them.

Police also seized a black cap with the five-pointed red star and 11 mini porcelain containers from the suspects after they arrived here from Bangkok, Thailand.

State police chief Datuk Abdul Rahim Hanafi told reporters the men had arrived on board a Thai Airways flight at 9.50pm.

Acting on a tip-off, we detained the men as soon as they entered the airport’s passenger lounge at 10.30am.

The men, who did not resist arrest, were taken to Bayan Baru police station for interview.

Police checks showed the men had gone to Bangkok to attend Chin Peng’s cremation on Monday.

Abdul. Rahim said the case would be investigated under the Printing and Publication Act, 2012 for smuggling the items which are deemed as illegal since the men did not have prior approval from the authorities to bring the items to the country.

The men were later released on police bail after having their statements recorded.

Among the items seized from the two men at the Bayan International Airport in Penang. NSTP/Danial Saad

Read more: Two men detained with Chin Peng related items – Latest – New Straits Times


The attempt to bring the remains or ashes of Chin “Butcher of Malaya” Peng serve as a ‘memorial’ for those who would intentionally want to skew history, in the attempts for having the minority over power the majority.

It is important for these minorities to overpower the imaginations of younger Malaysians to not see how history unravelled as Malayan Union was declared, opposed, and overturned, with only political pressure of the Malays as the majority of Malayans in the mid 1940s. The force of Malays from the unity, was also translated behind the strong rallies for HRH Rulers. As such, Britain was forced to negotiate and the Federation of Tanah Melayu Treaty was signed on 21 January 1948.

Perjanjian Persekutuan Tanah Melayu, 21 January 1948

Perjanjian Persekutuan Tanah Melayu, 21 January 1948

Federation of Tanah Melayu was born. The treaty served as the basis of role and position of HRH Rulers, the Malay Special Rights, Malay as the language and Islam as the religion of the Federation and position and conditions as ‘subjects of HRH Rulers’ are clearly provided in the articles .

According to historian Prof. Tan Sri Khoo Kay Kim, the ‘social contract’ is when HRH Rulers were convinced by then UMNO President and Chief Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra to relinquish their right to absolute monarchy and in turn gave the power to rule to the rakyat under Westminster-styled ‘Constitutional Monarchy’ democracy.

HRH Malay Rulers, UMNO representataives, Menteri Menteri Besar and British High Commissioner at the Federation of  Tanah Melayu Treaty, inked on 21 Jan 1948

HRH Malay Rulers, UMNO representataives, Menteri Menteri Besar and British High Commissioner at the Federation of Tanah Melayu Treaty, inked on 21 Jan 1948

This was achieved after the July 1955 Federal Consultative Council general election where UMNO led the three-party coalition and the Malays, who were 84% of the eligible voters amongst the rakyat gave the Alliance Party an thumping landslide. It was the first form of democracy and self-governant was achieved which empowered Tunku to form a Cabinet to formulate policies, for the administration.

After the self-governing, Tunku wanted to meet Chin “Butcher of Malaya” Peng. It is obvious the strong majority of the Malays, who were rightful citizens of Federation of Malaya are with him and wanted CPM to lay down their arms. The met at the Baling Talks on 28-29 December 1955. Chin Peng refused the amnesty offer and cannot accept that Malayans did not want the CPM.

Force 136 Wataniah: Ctr row: Ibrahim Ismail (3rd fr. left),  Yeop Mahidin (3rd fr. right), Abdul Razak Hussein (far right)

WWII warriors Force 136 Wataniah: seated on centre row: Captain Ibrahim Ismail (3rd fr. left), Lt. Yeop Mahidin (3rd fr. right), Capt. Abdul Razak Hussein (far right)

What was interesting is that Chin Peng told Tunku that they would end the rebellion if Tunku could earn Kemerdekaan. However, that did not materialise. In fact, CPM continued to wage the war and atrocities against sovereign Malaya (later Malaysia) for another 32 years thereon.

In January 1956, Tunku left for London with his Alliance Party colleagues and after a series of negotiations, Kemerdekaan was achieved scheduled for 31 August 1957. All of these were achieved through the process of consultations and negotiations, without shedding blood.

84% of the eligible voters in the 1955 Federal Consultative Council general election are the Malays, who were 'Subjects of HRH Rulers'.

84% of the eligible voters in the 1955 Federal Consultative Council general election are the Malays, who were ‘Subjects of HRH Rulers’.

The Federal Constitution was put in place and came into force when sovereignty was achieved when the instrument of Kemerdekaan was signed.

In order for the minority to come into power, it is imperative that the Malays are weakened. Therefor it is necessary for the influence of Malay nationalists through UMNO in Malaysian politics, history and social landscape are being down played, dismantled and eventually systematically eroded.

Even role and position of HRH Rulers, Islam as the religion and Malay as the language of the Federation of Malaysia are not sparred and currently being systematically challenged, via multiple prongs.

It is without doubt, the Malays played pivotal role in the defense and security of this nation ever since the outbreak of World War II. Post war saw the involvement of more Malays in the Police and army, particularly the Royal Malay regiments to ensure the rebellion of the communist terrorists are foiled.

The attack on Bukit Kepong Police Station on 23 February 1950 where 26 Policemen and women and children are murdered and post Kemerdekaan Kroh Massacre on 18 June 1968, where 17 Field Force Policemen are brutally killed are demonstrations that the communist rebels waged a war against the Malays as security personnel.

Instead, they manipulated the imaginations of the younger Malaysians by portraying Chin “Butcher of Malaya” Peng, CPM and the leftists were the true opposers and the same time demonise UMNO and HRH Rulers as lackeys of the colonialists. That is reflected in the attempt to blatantly lie in the political process of the late 1940s and celebrating the leftists’ ‘Sang Saka Malaya’ should be true Malaysian flag instead of the Jalur Gemilang.

The Federal Government should uphold Tuanku Sultan Selangor’s titah and the Constitution and take very stern action against these anarchist and Neo Min Yuens, who have been proven to threaten the sanctity of this nation. As for Chin “Butcher of Malaya” Peng, never showed compassion nor remorse for the atrocities he did in the series of war waged against Malayans and later Malaysians, even after British left.

Published in: on September 27, 2013 at 04:00  Comments (32)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

32 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. DAP,PAP ,Parti Komunist Malaya and Party Komunist CHIna have the same structure as political party.The secretary General not the Chairman is the most powerful post in the party.

    I disagree with Sultan that Chin Peng is the enemy of the state.He was the enemy of the state before the Peace Agreement in Hatyai sign in 1989. Once the agreement signed,we forgive and forget the past sin.

    Otherwise,we are not honorouble.

    • Thank you.

      The Hadyaii Accord signed 2 Dec 1989 means that CPM laid down their arms and their rebellion is over. It also means that the Malaysian security authorities no longer hunt them down like dangerous predators.

      It doesn’t at all mean we forgave them and God forbids, we conveniently forget what they did.

      HRH Tuanku Sultan Selangor is right. Chin “Butcher of Malaya” Peng did led a rebellion which caused atrocities.

      Peace achieved doesn’t exonerate the atrocities and pain Chin “Butcher of Malaya” Peng and CPM rebels inflicted to tens of thousands of Malaysians, throughout the years.

      Please read this, this and this, which provide some degree of the gravity for the immense burden of pain inflicted by the most brutal murderer this nation have ever seen.

    • Nora,

      Heard of Chairman Mao? Communist Mao Zedong? He was the most powerful in China until he died in the 1970s.

      His economic policy called The Great Leap Forward leaped backward so much that millions died from starvation, fights over food etc. He was losing grip on the Chinese Communist Party, yet they followed his wishes in the so-called Cultural Revolution of the 1960s where factions fought one another and more died, until the death toll, including from hunger etc, was estimated at 30 million.

      During the Cultural Revolution he craftily encouraged the people to speak up their minds and through that he identified his enemies, whacked them, managed to redeem himself and ruled many more years.

      Forgiving and forgetting past sins too easily may lead to the resurgence of Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong, terrorist Chin Peng, the race riots of 1969, etc. That’s why there’s such a thing as history – it reminds people not to repeat bad deeds.

    • H R H Sultan of Selangor statement are in line with the majority of the rakyat ,and I believe their symphtyser and supporter too could be considered as enemy of the state too.

  2. Chin Peng never abandoned his communist ideology. The fact that he agreed to the PeaceAgreement in 1989 could be seen in the context of his ambition of turning Malaysia into a communist state was fast diminishing. This maybe attributed to the success of Malaysian defence and security forces in sustaining combat against communist insurgency and due to the rise of Teng Tsao Ping in China who opened up China to the world premised on the need to develop China’s economy and begun friendly relations with non- communist states. Without the support of communist China, Chin Peng’s only recourse was to accept whatever olive branch so as to stay alive. If he had renounced communism why didnt he accept the offer of citizenship? The nature of Chin Peng’s insurgency activities were so brutal, even with the Peace Agreement, why should civilians treat him with honour for his past atrocities? This is where it is baffling when certain quarters harped on Chin Peng atrocities as acts of fighting for freedom. Terrorists can never be honoured as heroes or iconic legends – dead or alive.

  3. What PAS President Hadi talking “Here we find it difficult to forgive ..”?

    Nik Aziz easy to forgive?

    Masuk Neraka sommore. Sembahayang hajat sommore.

    BBbbbb … Aiyya, I better stop, otherwise not-easy-to-forgive-words might come out.

  4. Thank you.
    I dis agree with your view on Chin peng.
    Tan Sri Rahim,x IGP and the head of SB when he negotiated the peace agreement also disagree we should treat Chin Peng as the enemy after Hatyai peace agreement.He voice his disagreement quite strongl,not once but twice.

    There are many version that surface on Chin Peng role as resistant group fighting the British force in Malaya.I strongly believe that the main reason why the British decided to give us independent because the cant win fighting Chin Peng force.
    What happen after Merdeka was another story.There are many breakaway force within Chin Peng force.Some are radicial and want continue to fight .
    We have to be vary clear on communist idology.
    While we reject communist party at the same time we establish diplomatic relationship with China and Russia.

    • Establishing diplomatic relations with China and socialist Russia enabled Malaysia to neutralise whatever monetary or moral support the CPM might have got from those 2 countries. Diplomatic relations entail the political non-interference of each other’s State, and it does not amount to the recognition of an ideology but recognition of the existence of a State vis-à-vis an international system. Tun Razak’s establishment of diplomatic relations with China in 1975 was aimed at neutralising China’s support for CPM. Peace Agreement or Accord has specific terms of reference and can anyone tell if the agreement/accord itself made Malaysia obligated to honour Chin Peng upon his death? I don’t believe so. If Malaysia wants to be so accommodating to pardon and forgive and forget perpetrators of violence and terror, Malaysia must be prepared to face perpetrators of terror and violence who expect Malaysia to forgive and forget. Know what? The world doesn’t work that way. The Malaysian govt is absolutely correct to not let Chin Peng entered Msia – dead or alive.

    • The British wanted to give Malaya independence because of the political and economic developments occurring in Europe itself after the end of WWII. It was a decade of decolonisation and Malaya was just one of the many British colonies that were earmarked to be given independence. Britain was economically impoverished as a result of WWII and it was expensive to maintain its empire. There was also the refocus of Britain’s attention towards Europe with the establishment of the Coal and Steel Community in 1951 which later evolved and has now become the EU. The British hearts and minds were no longer with their colonies and were eager to work with Malay politicians in Malaya towards granting Malaya’s independence. CPM was already a threat and huge menace and granting independence merely transferred the problem to the Malayan govt. There was no other choice. And some really went googogaga over Chin Peng for fighting the Japs. Well the Sino-Japanese animosity existed long before the Japs landed in Malaya, so CPM saw the Japs as their natural enemy to battle with and not because CPM and Chin Peng were freedom fighters for a free and democratic Malaya.

      • As a footnote, the British did provide an interim defence umbrella to the newly independent Malaya through the Anglo-Malayan Defence Agreement. This helped Malaya later Malaysia defend its territorial integrity during Konfrontasi with Indonesia and when the Philippines initiated claims on Sabah. So, where was Chin Peng? Still waging war with Malaya/Malaysia and the Yang diPertuan Agong, whilst the British despite leaving Malaya for good helped Malaya/Malaysia in terms of defence assistance through AMD.

    • Nora,

      I not only disagree with you on Chin Peng but also urge you to read more of the established history of this country.

      I hope you have not relied much on Wikipedia as that’s the place where the DAP kind try to “re-write” history, saying, for example, that the Malays caused the Larut Wars I,II,III&IV instead of the Ghee Hin and Hai San secret societies, thugs and gangsters killing one another for control of tin mines until wars erupted, engulfing the then existing 250 Malay tin mines in the process – read Sejarah Perak by Prof MA Fawzi Basri, published by Yayasan Perak.

      Do note that any Ahmad, Chong and Muthu can write articles in Wikipedia and the Editors’ annotations keep asking for authorities or reliable references for statements made therein, such that the articles there keep changing over time.

      Do note also that the British decided to give us independence not “because the(y) cant win fighting Chin Peng” but because the system of Empires was starting to crumble down the world over, Britain started giving India independence in 1947 – that was the largest source of income from the colonies for Britain and when that happened, maintenance of the other colonies was hardly sustainable.

    • Tan Sri Rahim may have his own interpretation of the peace agreement. He may want to be sentimental about it. In any case, just because we are willing to make peace does not mean everything must be forgotten and forgiven.

      The peace agreement simply says; for the sake of peace and to prevent further bloodshed, the warring parties agree to cease all armed hostilities. No where in the agreement states that the belligerent must acknowledged that the other side is not guilty for the heinous crime they had committed. It did however, made explicit that the belligerent may no longer prosecute the other for it. At this point in time Malaysian security forces had reduced the threat from the Communist Terrorist which Chin Peng led to a state where they are considered to be insignificant, yet in the spirit of moving forward and our love for peace we agreed to the lopsided term of the accord. We sacrificed our right to put Chin Peng on trial for his crime and punish him accordingly. That show how humane and forgiving Malaysian government are.

      Chin Peng had the opportunity to apply and pursue his privileges as provided under the peace accord to request to become Malayan citizen but he squandered the opportunity by letting it lapsed.

      You are wrong in saying/believing that British granted Malaya its independence because they cant win fighting Chin Peng Force. This romantic idea about Communist Terrorist guerilla warfare prowess and invinsibility is a myth propagated by PKM organ for propaganda. Just the same, it is an indication of your ignorance on history and state of international affairs of that time.

      USA and USSR are the arch enemy that possessed the ability to destroy the world many times over during the heights of the cold war. They fought several proxy war in many parts of the world, yet they do maintain diplomatic relation for practical purposes. Establishing diplomatic relation between states does not mean you have to agree on every single thing. Oh by the way, Russia is not a communist country.

      As His Royal Highness rightly said, Chin Peng was the enemy of the state. His objective was not independence, it was to turn Malaya into a communist country a la People Republic of China through the use of force of arms. The fight for independence is just a stepping stone toward that objective.

      Fast forward today, the biggest threat this country is facing came from the remnants of the Communist Terrorist civilian wing which apparently is still alive and active albeit under a different guise and employing a different strategy. They are dangerous and hiding in plain sight. They are the new age MIN YUEN!!!

      • Chin Peng kept the top, strategic and even tactical leadership posts of CPM only amongst Chinese. The war waged here in Malaya went full blown when Mao’s communist forces over ran Chiang’s Kuomintang. At least, when they started to control most part of mainland China.

        Its is clear not only Chin Peng wanted to create a communist state in this country, based on People’s Republic of China, he also is wanted to create People’s Republic of Malaya where the Politburo is all but one token Malay.

        CPM is about an armed rebellion with the objective to install a Chinese communist-maoist-stalinist military dictatorship. And I am not surprised they would start to practice genocide like Khmer Rouge did to the Cambodians too.

        The attitude and practice of what Chin Peng wanted to do is so bloody prevalent in the new age Min Yuens; presenting the DAP. Probably the Min Yuens would still hv Abdullah CD as party Vice Chairman.

        Its no different from the existing trait of the DAP. They had Ahmad Noor as Vice Chairman for years and later Tunku Aziz.

      • This is a 2+ hour long dialogue held in English on common, and some divergent, points between Islamic philosopher Prof. Gholamreza Aavani غلامرضا اعوانی and a Confucian philosopher Prof. Tu Weiming 杜维明. The dialogue was held in Beijing 北京 on 2013.06.17 :
        “On Self-Refinement and Wisdom in Social Governance”

        This is a discussion which will hardly make sense for DAPster and Pakatanist associates of the “Maoist Chin Peng rebel ideology syncretized with laissez-faire global capitalism and also neocon evangelism”.

  5. Oh, my. Poor understanding of history again, I see. The British first offered independence was on 1st Feb 1948, before the Emergency began. The Emergency began on 18 June 1948. UMNO rejected this offer of independence because the Malays were a minority and did not possess the right people for self-governing (not many Malays were educated, and economically weak). Chin Peng only agreed to meet the Tunku in Baling in 1956 when the CPM was being beaten on its own ground and were retreating further north.

    Establishing diplomatic relations with Communist China has nothing to do with embracing communist ideology. Nixon established diplomatic relations with China much earlier but it doesn’t mean the US agrees with the communist ideology. And Russia is not a communist country, mind you. The Soviet Union was.

    Some people continue to dwell in bad knowledge of history and try to become professors online.

  6. […] The “thirteen million plus Ringgit” guy rambles…. […]

  7. Chin peng was an ass. But i think the real reason the so called rulers hated him is because in his ideologies and vision, there would be no room for the so called self elected leaders who to be fair, would not think twice about selling the country.

    I am no supporter of chin peng and the values and ideas that he tried to impose but i am also no supporter of the self elected rulers.

    • “self elected rulers.”? Can say a bit more pls, my friend?

      • You think they were elected fair and square?

    • HRH Rulers hate Chin Peng and ALL the communist rebels becoz:

      1. They brutally commit atrocities
      2. They waged a very long war against HRH Rulers
      3. Chin Peng wanted to deatroy the monarchy, which is the symbol of the Malays and in place instal a Chinese communist maoist-stalinist dictatorship
      4. As communists, Chin Peng and his rebels will outlaw God
      5. All the Malay heritage and traditions would be outlawed and eventually systematically eroded

      Without any shred of doubt Chin Peng would ascend to be the self-elected leader of the country. After all, he is CPM Sec Gen by Communist Party of China’s orders.

      He would then make Malaya into People’s Democratic Republic of Malaya where there is no shred of democracy and rule in brute force very harsh iron fist.

      Malaya would be no different to China, Vietnam, Mongolia and worse still, North Korea and Republic Khmer.

      Make no mistake about that!

      • But i am of the view that their number one issue is that they would no longer be relevant.

        I am not doubting the reason you listed but merely stating that in my view, the numero uno reason for them opposing is, they would be the one who lost out most.

  8. […] The “thirteen million plus Ringgit” guy rambles…. […]

  9. “I want to remind those who tried to be an enemy and sell out

    the county to foreign parties to be cautious and to repent so

    that they do not commit this evil act again,”

    This statement made by Sultan Sharaffudin :-
    1. Remind us of the sentiments of rewriting Tanah Melayu(Malaysia) history by the racist opposition party – DAP and its alliance.

    2. In particular, we need to pay attention to medias such as The Star, The Malay Mail, MI, FMT and lately Yahoo news. They have been in the danger zone, manipulating sentional issues that were banned in previous years. Why are they doing these ? Is it because of EO ?

    I hope BD will make a special preview on this matter. Blogger helenang, reveals these culprits. There is no such as freedom press or thinking when making Malaysia at stake. Adoring Chin Peng means the expression of championing the butchering of malays….

  10. For over 40 years we fought an enemy who wanted to destroy our beloved country, the Royal Sultans and our Government. These icons are still with us. We won. And those who think otherwise must have their heads examined on something which is not history. See how America and her allies treated the Axis War criminals at Nuremberg and Tokyo. They hung them. Which of those who kow-towed in Bangkok have my experience :-

    1. In 1949, a Chinese rubber tapper was murdered on my family rubber estate in North Johore. Uncle Chin did not pull the trigger.

    2. In 1951, I sat in front of my Chinese classmate who was an Auxilliary Police recruit. His revolver discharged accidentally. The bullet passed through my desk and missed me by inches otherwise I would not have lived to tell this tale. Uncle Chin did not pull the trigger.

    All those with misplaced loyalties should not be TRUSTED.

    • If their heads are half as hard as Chin Peng’s, my goodness, they would refuse to have them examined, bro.

      I feel that, while we keep on whacking and wanking them in ways we deem fit, we must also keep repeating the following that has been written here and there:

      1. Professor Emeritus (History) Tan Sri Khoo Kay Kim said “Berhijrah lah” to those who don’t like this country (that occasion he referred to was blokes behaving badly at Dataran Merdeka on Merdeka eve 2012)

      2. Minister of Home Affairs Dato Seri Ahmad Zahid said those who don’t like the system that exists in the Constitution of this country (not accepting the results of PRU13, demo here demo there), migrate to countries whose system they like.

      So we tell those hard-headed blokes time and time again, especially when they show no respect for and don’t abide by the Constitution of this country, to Berambus lah. (Same difference in those words).

      • I would include those who attack UMNO and the President within that category as well. If you are a communist sympathiser or you don’t respect Najib , THEN GET OUT OF MALAYSIA!

  11. No matter what, as proven, Communism is alive and well in Malaysia. Like DAP, the members are aware that they are the core design of Communism but try to reason it out by hiding behind the name of ‘democracy’. Worst than that, it has developed deeper into a racist-chauvinistic blind party loyalists today. 

    The basic ideology, DAP is the Chauvinistic/Chinese union philosophy. They are positioned in collective bargaining to defile the Constitution. It has become a practice of DAP’s day to day policies.

    The idea of their economic worth is for their own kind by having Communist China as their sole investor in the State they govern. DAP’s State Government ignores the Malaysia policy toward Republic of China. The Malaysian-Sino international relation is usually neither ally nor enemy. Malaysia does not regard China as an adversary but as a neutral friend in selected areas as far as trade and commerce are concerned. But the State Government of Penang, its policy subtly demonstrated that China is an ally. 

    The central power in Penang is going through a social engineering exercises  in favor for supposedly of collective Chinese collective interest. Their workplace is gearing toward collection and distribution of resources from China incorporated by the State of Penang central power.

    Lim Guan Eng is promoting the ideas and he knows exactly what he is promoting, pandering to the Chinese electorate for votes by his grand agenda. He is selling Malaysia out for personal power under his party organization, DAP, a collective bargaining, union mentality, socialism at first, and communism in the end.

    • That’s true. DAP has succeeded in a big way to indoctrinate its chauvinist-racist and anti-Malays ideology and policy among the young generation non-Malays. Its use of rights and democracy as a tool to camouflage its true intentions and agenda appear to have a great appeal among its target groups. Unfortunately, it is here that some young generation Malays dont use their discerning qualities to detect the true nature of DAP, hence tend to agree with DAP ‘s meritocracy and Malaysian Malaysia and foolishly follow it blindly. Penang may have become the centre and breeding ground for the spread of DAP’s racist- chauvinist ideology and the State itself has become like a ‘ No Welcome’ zone for Malays’ socio-economic opportunities. Penang is a microcosome of Malaysia should Pakatan rules Malaysia.

      The chinese esp among the young generation are already showing their arrogance towards the Malays as a race. They may have been indoctrinated that Malays are inferior compared to them and hence to be viewed with contempt and in a condescending manner. Once the ideology takes root in their minds, it will not go away and talking about unity, reconciliation or 1Malaysia maybe like trying to grapple in thin air. The race relations in Malaysia is not in a good state and maybe it’d be like this for a very long time or forever. With the govt led by liberals and advised by liberals, the situation will favour DAP since it uses liberal argument to usher in the power of chauvinism.

      • I want to comment on this statement.

        The chinese esp among the young generation are already showing their arrogance towards the Malays as a race. They may have been indoctrinated that Malays are inferior compared to them and hence to be viewed with contempt and in a condescending manner…

        My perspectives.

        Spot on comment. The arrogance and hatred between races is genuine and people really dislike each other intensely. DAP is partially responsible for this. They gave the ‘pull’ factor. The ‘push’ factor was the behaviour of UMNO Youth after the 2004 GE. All the races had supported BN but then UMNO Youth with KJ and Hishammudin in tow used the platform to threaten the non-Malays. Since then, non-Malays had very negative impression of UMNO and the Malays as well.

        But all of this I feel is academic. In 20 years time, the differential birth rates between the communities as well as the mass migration of young non-Malays to other countries (“good riddance” ) will mean that Malaysia should return to a virtually mono ethnic society, as it was before the British came. Perhaps that will be best for all.

  12. […] two ways about arguing that the DAP has no linkages to the banned Communist Party of Malaysia. The DAP leaders public argument and participation in the recent bereavement of the CPM Secretary General Chin “Butcher of Malaya” Peng is a clear […]

  13. Here are the facts about the No 1 Terrorist and the brilliant Lee Kuan Yew with his 10 failed Policies for Singapore.
    Read the comments in both.
    The Singaporeans were caught between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea or between a Rock and a Hard Place until our beloved Tunku despatched the most senior Chinese Adviser to the Government in 1962 to save the brilliant Lee Kuan Yew from the Communists in his PAP by cutting the Gordian Knot. Operation Cold Store came afterwards and all the Communists were locked up for life. In 1964, the brilliant Lee Kuan Yew attempted to takeover the Federal Government and the rest is history which has yet to be told. It was the Tunku who saved the brilliant Lee Kuan Yew in 1962.

  14. The most senior Chinese Adviser to the Federal Government was Tan Sri C.C. Too, a world expert on Communist insurgency recognised by the United States and Great Britain.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: