Being fair to Proton

Pride is a virtue, when it comes to coming to common sense for a Malaysian made product. A lot of Malaysians probably look at the the right angles to agree but the louder minority, nit-pick to justify themselves otherwise.

Regardless, August next year will mark Proton or its original name, Perusahan Otomobil National, of 30 years in automobile assembly and production mainly for the Malaysian market. It has been an enigma of erratic bumpy ride, all the way.

Proton sales, the past ten years

Proton sales, the past ten years. Notice the huge dip in 2006.

Proton started in late 1984 with re-badging of then the Mitsubishi Lancer. That opened opportunities for Malaysian automotive part manufacturers to begin operations   by supplying components to the first generation Proton Saga. As the local content increases, more opportunities are being opened. By 1987, Proton started to introduce variants to the Proton Saga with automatic transmission and later hatchback models.

By then, Proton had become an automotive household name. By early 1990s, Proton is the major mark on the streets where the market share stands in the neighbourhood of 65% of new cars sold. The growth provided progression.

In 1993, Proton introduced the model Wira which was a move away from the many variants of Saga. By end of the year, Proton market share is 74% of new cars sold and registered in Malaysia.

In 1996, the ownership and control of Proton was handed to automotive king DRB founder Tan Sri Yahya Ahmad. He was destined to transform the Malaysian automotive industry and had big plans. By October 1996, Yahya acquired British renown design, R&D and racing car production house Lotus Ltd., as part of Proton’s strategic plan to move forward.

However, it was short-lived when he was killed in a helicopter accident on 2 March 1997.

His effort did not go to waste. As a matter of fact, it was carried through by his successor. Proton started its own design team and the engineers started to develop their own design.

The outcome is  by 2000, Proton introduced its own indigenous product Waja 1.6L. It replaced the second Mitisubishi Lancer-derived product, Proton Wira. Proton was realising the vision envisaged of Fourth Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad to take Malaysia as an industrial nation with technical and technology competency and capability.

When it was exported abroad, it was well received. Even in the critical British market. Proton earned the title “Fastest growing imported car in so short of time”.

The collaboration and synergy with wholly owned-subsidiary Lotus of Norwich brought a lot of goodies for Proton models, which are categorised under the compact segment. Examples are the first and second generation Satria and Satria Neo.

Proton was incepted and incorporated 1983 under Heavy Industries Company (Hicom) because Tun Dr. Mahathir saw the strategic values from the ability for Malaysians to have automotive technology capability. It was a starting point for the learning curve, for an eventual capability of a fully industrialised nation and technological competency as a developed nation status.

The strategy was even bigger than that. Using automotive as a starting point, Malaysia could eventually move into the design and manufacturing for defense equipments such as armoured vehicles and battle tanks.

However, Tun Dr. Mahathir’s vision which started to show potential from growth,  was not followed through when PM ‘Flip-Flop’ Abdullah Ahmad Badawi took over. In fact, not only the strategy of developing a full blown automotive industry capability was totally neglected, in the excuse of open-ness to global trade and doing away with protectionism policies for specific industries.

An Ethos Consulting developed National Automotive Policy (NAP) was introduced where Malaysian automobile market was opened to more imports and the liberalisation began. The lame excuse was Malaysian motoring consumer deserve the bigger options of imported cars.

At the same time, Proton was treated as an investment and placed and restructured under Khazanah Nasional Bhd., where then trusted Chairman Dato’ Azlan Abdullah started a process of cannibalising and eventually the beginning of slow death.

Never the less, Proton manged to design and develop their own indigenous products such as the Preve and Suprima S models. Considering the amount of CAPEX which was invested for the development of these two products compared to the other in the same class, the outcome was brilliant.

On merit, these two models should able to win against any other brands in Malaysia since both came into the market as ‘fully loaded’. However, there are minority within the targeted market who are bold in their criticism to these models.

The Proton Perdana based on the 8th generation Honda Accord

The Proton Perdana based on the 8th generation Honda Accord

In 2012 Proton ownership was again reverted to DRB Hicom for a cash consideration of RM 1.2 billion. Proton under the new management was quickly synergised with marks under he DRB belt. Proton collaborated with Honda.

Under the pressing demand by the Malaysian Government to replace the Proton Perdana model which was introduced in 1995 based on Mitsubishi Eterna, Proton struck a deal with Honda to develop the new generation choice staff car for Ministers, Deputy Ministers, Chief Secretaries and Chief Executives of Government bodies and senior civil servants based on the 8th generation of Honda Accord.

The Petronas developed 2.0L turbo-charged engine

In mid-2015, Proton would introduce a Malaysian indigenous designed and produced which was developed and acquired from Petronas.

Currently, it is a 2.0L turbo-charged four in-line engine which produces 190HP and planned for the second generation Proton Perdana, which recently being introduced based on the 8th generation Honda Accord. A 1.6L and 1.8L are being planned, to power the Preve and Suprima S models.

Proton badge, in mid 80s

The saying of “Proof in the pudding is in the eating”. All those critics of Proton products should give the current models available in the market Saga FLV, Satria Neo, Preve and Suprima S and upcoming Perdana the fair chance based on merits due.

In the exercise to rationalise the Malaysian automotive industry which include the imports via the AP system, the Federal Government introduced the National Automotive Policy (NAP) 2014 on 20 January 2014.

NST story:

20 January 2014| last updated at 06:02PM

NAP 2014: Highlights

KUALA LUMPUR: Following are highlights of the National Automotive Policy (NAP) 2014 unveiled by the International Trade and Industry Minister Datuk Seri Mustapa Mohamed today:


* to promote competitive and sustainable domestic automotive industry including the national automotive companies.

* to transform Malaysia into a regional automotive hub in energy-efficient vehicles (EEV)

* to promote higher value-added activities

* to bolster exports of vehicles and components

* to encourage participation of Bumiputera companies in total value chain of the domestic automotive industry

* to safeguard consumers’ interest by offering safer and better quality products at competitive prices.

* Overall, the NAP 2014 provides a total financial package of about RM2 billion and measures and implementation plans to realise the NAP 2014

* The NAP 2014 targets at least 200,000 units of cars to be exported while exports of components will reach a minimum value of RM10 billion in 2020

* The government is open to possibilities to reduce excise duties gradually when the fiscal situation permits.

* On Approved Permits (APs), the government has decided an indepth study to be undertaken to asses the impact of the termination of Bumiputera participation in the auto industry.

* The NAP 2009 has specified for termination of the open AP by Dec 31, 2015 and the franchise AP by Dec 31, 2020


* A car price reduction framework has been developed to fulfil the promise of gradual reduction ranging 20 per cent to 30 per cent over the next five years.

* More new national car models and variants will be introduced at competitive prices this year.

* The NAP 2014 will see a bigger base of new models being introduced in the domestic market. These models will not only be greener but also safer.

* The government is constantly reviewing its fiscal position and is open to possibility to reduce excise duties when the fiscal situation permits.

* Models such as Saga SV, Persona SV, Viva, Alza and MyVi S Series, the new Honda Jazz and Nissan Almera were introduced at reduced prices of between three and 17 per cent. These models accounted for 30 per cent of market share in 2013.


* Malaysia to become an energy-efficient vehicle (EEV) hub. This encompasses strategies and measures to strengthen the entire value chain of the automotive industry and will also lead to environment conservation, high-income job creation, transfer of technology and create new economic opportunities for local companies.

* The EEV includes fuel-efficient vehicles, hybrid, electric vehicles and alternatively-fuelled vehicles.


Proton is confident that the NAP 2014 would be the ‘push factor’ for the corporation and brand to do better.

The Malay Mail story:

Proton says will ‘survive’ greater competition in new auto policy


Tan Sri Khamil Jamil, the chairman of Proton, also said today that Proton was not ‘for sale’. — Picture by Choo Choy MayTan Sri Khamil Jamil, the chairman of Proton, also said today that Proton was not ‘for sale’. — Picture by Choo Choy May

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 20 — National carmaker Proton insisted today it will “survive” the greater competition from foreign vehicle producers now that the government has liberalised the auto industry to woo others into the market, under new guidelines in the revised National Automotive Policy (NAP) 2014.

Tan Sri Khamil Jamil, the chairman of Proton, said the company — which critics have seen as heavily relying on the government’s past protection from competition — will grow further.

“Proton will continue to survive and be stronger and better,” he told reporters today at the unveiling of the National Automotive Policy (NAP) 2014 here.

He later disagreed that Proton was “for sale”, saying that the company had undertaken “structural changes” and “structural improvement”, but did not provide further details.

“I believe, like what the minister has said, Proton is still very relevant together with Perodua, two national automotive companies that will play a vibrant and focal role to enhance the local automotive industry,” said Khamil, who is also the managing director of DRB-Hicom Bhd, which is the sole owner of Proton.

Earlier, International Trade and Industry Minister Datuk Seri Mustapa Mohamed acknowledged that Proton has been facing stiffer competition than before as the car market becomes increasingly liberalised.

Mustapa said the government did the “right thing” when it set up Proton in 1983, but noted that the country’s inking of free trade agreements with the Southeast Asian region and countries like Japan and Australia was opening up the car market.

“At present, the market is becoming more and more open because of AFTA, ASEAN, cars are imported duty-free, so the market is more liberalised now,” he said.

Mustapa said that MITI previously controlled car prices to protect Proton, but said it was now dictated by market forces which will result in a competitive industry.

“There was a time when car companies have to come to MITI for approval to set prices, that was to protect Proton, but the policy has been dismantled in 2004,” he said.

Mustapa also said Proton has undergone changes in the past few years in a bid to be more efficient and competitive.

Today, Khamil touched on Proton’s plans to produce energy efficient vehicles (EEV), saying that it was already in partnership with carmaker Honda Malaysia Sdn Bhd.

Honda, in which Proton owns a stake, has committed to pouring in RM 1,000 million to build hybrid cars in Malacca.

Proton is also working on its own EEV model, Khamil said.

“We are on track, hopefully by end of 2015, we will see some results for Proton,” he said.

Even before the NAP’s unveiling today, three car companies had already agreed to invest in EEV production here — including Honda, Perodua’s RM1,300 million investment and Mazda’s RM300 million investment.


Based on the NAP 2014, it is likely single largest portion of the 200,000 units of exported Malaysian made or assembled cars would come from Proton. On top of that, emphasis have been given to the development of ‘green cars’ (EEV), which Proton is deep into the development its own electrical and fuel cell models.

Proton success story for the export markets

Proton success story for the export markets

The affordability range models, where Saga FLV and Persona SV are categorised under, are two products offered by Proton with a lot of goodies. It is not just the value of the car, with the equipment and trim but also affordability ownership programs where consumers ‘Buy now, pay later’ schemes.

Proton is also the car manufacturer which opened the biggest opportunity for the participation of home grown automotive vendor development program for component and parts manufacturers. At the moment, there 360 companies serving the entire Proton supply chain.

The rationalisation of the new models plus re-strategising the brand and marketing and product placement programs is part of DRB’s commitment to make Proton a success story.

These are the mitigating justification part of the RM2 billion financial package offered and made available should be allocated for Proton. Under DRB-Hicom, Proton is set to maximise its production capability and optimumise all assets and resources the new roadmap laid out.

That would justify even if being analysed in the context as a corporation, the criticism should be made in the right perspective and consideration taking into consideration the variance in ownership and management, through time and spectrum of current events and mitigating circumstances and environment. It is very easy and probably fashionable in some quarters to make generalisation based on perception and taking re-phrased and re-packaged sweeping pot shots.

In reality, Proton came a long way through in the dynamism of a globally very competitive and challenging industry. It had been a volatile learning curve in the past thirty years and the national car project did follow through and now ready to move into the next phase, as part of a promising automotive group which has proven its steady growth and to add value.

Proton badge, present day

Proton badge, present day

Then again to be balanced and the same time correct, is an intellectual virtue which distinguishes one’s sense of observation and analysis, differentiating from any intent to express one’s thoughts tinged with omni-lethal concoction of the mixture between mischief and malice.

Published in: on January 25, 2014 at 23:59  Comments (8)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

8 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. I worry. I’m not convinced that Najib’s liberalization program is what the country needs at this point and time. I’m not sure if it’s the answer to the economic woes of the country in recent times and in the near future.

    I think Najib has created unfair competition. The strong, the more experienced, those with much more resources are allowed to compete with the weak, the less experienced and those with limited resources.

    Proton and Perodua are relatively new in the auto industry compared to the Japanese, even the Korean cars. Even the US protects the smaller companies. They have anti-monopoly laws to ensure the smaller ones are not gobbled up by the big ones.

    Najib does not seem to care about the Malays and the Bumiputeras in business. Those who don’t have a culture of doing business, unlike the Chinese. Even the mainland Chinese, who claim to have a much longer history than the Japanese, were far behind – even regarded as an economic pariah by the West for a long time – until only 2-3 decades ago. I resent Najib.

    • I don’t like Najib’s disregard for the aims and objectives of the founding fathers and present diehard members and supporters of UMNO – to protect and promote the rights and interests of the Malays. Not leveling the playing field and making the Malays meekly dance on it is just plain unfair.

      His putting aside the NEP is treacherous to the UMNO cause. I think his father, Tun A Razak, cringes in his grave if he can see what the son has done since coming into power. And he came to power on his father’s name. Tun Dr Mahathir paved the way for him.

      I want, and very much hope and pray, that Tun Dr Mahathir would set things right. Especially when Proton and Perodua are TDM’s babies.

      TDM has said he made the mistake of paving the way for Tun Dol to become PM. The country began to be in a mess under Tun Dol. Now there’s a weak government under Najib. Exploited and battered, the government not much respected, called kangkung etc.

      Oh God, please have Najib changed. One way or the other. Get another UMNO leader to lead. Muhyiddin. As the UMNO No. 2, he is very much in line. He is the one seen as concerned about the UMNO agenda. Saying and doing things to pursue it. He is what we want.

  2. I wish Proton all the best. My only complain is why they still haven’t they come up Malaysian SUV. If they make it look as sporty as Nissan Juke, I’m sure the youngsters and the young at heart will buy Proton..

  3. BD,

    These past three years, Proton offered great products to the Malaysian motoring consumer market. Fully loaded and value for money. Even a Mitsubushi Lancer re-badged model Inspira got the Lotus handling and suspension technology derived from Lotus.

    Then came the Preve and now Suprima S. Amazing quality of technology infused, almost at par with those Continental marks which are easily in the RM50k more range.

    Definitely value added for the consumers.

    The new maintenance and service facilities in the now well networked and re-structured Proton Edar workshops across the country is very refreshing.

    Its obvious these car prices are coming down as compared to three years ago. Coupled with more equipment installed and offered and better packages made available to consumers, is the evidence that Proton under DRB is only going to take it forward and make it better.

    The decision to hive off Proton is the best Khazanah ever made, since several cock-ups like the doomed ‘share-swap’ and all the premium properties all over Greater Johor Bahru sold off to Chinamen like Lim Kang Hoo, Robert Kuok and from across the straits.

    Look at the track record in operations, revenue, profit and value growth with Al Bukhary Group appointed managememt after the 2006 take over. Proton would just be synergised into the Group and ride and optimise the resources and strength available, to achieve better in performance and value on the both axis.

    Only skeptics with prejudice and/or ill intent to see another Malay success story not becoming a reality would want to think and influence people otherwise.

    The fact is, DRB Group would be the most successful automotive industrial group in the region, with end-to-end businesses, subsidiaries, associate companies and fairly well developed vendor system. And Proton would be part of that glorious history.

    Mind you, Malay professionals all the way!

    Proton back into DRB Group is ‘Sirih pulang ke ganggang’.

    • Omar Ong?

      And where’s Mustapha Ong?

      Good that Bukhary took over Proton before Najib became PM. Otherwise Omar Ong would have been hammered into the Board, like Petronas – for whatever purpose I have never been able to find out.

      And they say Petronas top management is now 50% non-Malay. WTF ..

  4. Be truthful la BD. You’re hitting back against what Outsyed the Box wrote!

    It’s so obvious!

    Then again I don’t agree with him on the ‘Proton School of Management’. Its taking jibes on something in the past.

    Like blaming Musa Mohamed because he was a lousy education minister & should hv remained a VC. Who’d even remember him! That’s how irrelevant he was to the education system.

    • So what if it’s against what Outsyed the Box wrote? I don’t even visit the blog – what’s so great about it?

      And what’s your point? The post is about being fair to Proton. You haven’t even said whether you agree or not. I agree with what BD and the other participants wrote above.

      Btw, calling yourself anti-Hadith, what does that make you? And what’s your point in using that name?


  5. […] Proton is moving into a new era on the matrix of quantity-quality. Both, in the context and perspective of the corporation which started from the national car project and the brand of a Malaysian made car. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: