Malicious media

The Wall Street Journal is nothing but a media with malicious intent as a tool of Anti-Najib Campaign, when 1MDB was quick to reiterate the fact that no monies within their group was transfered to Prime Minister Dato’ Sri Mohd. Najib Tun Razak’s personal account.

Media statement by 1Malaysia Development Berhad

Issued on 01 Mar 2016

For immediate publication

Response to Wall Street Journal

1MDB has consistently maintained that it has not paid any funds to the personal accounts of the Prime Minister.

This has been reiterated by multiple lawful authorities including the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission, the Malaysian Attorney General, and various reputable international publications, who have confirmed that these funds came from Saudi Arabia.

Despite this, the Wall Street Journal continues to repeat the same disproven allegations.

However, not once has the publication offered any conclusive evidence to support its claims, with the only justification for their continued attacks being information that they claim to have obtained from unnamed and anonymous sources.

This reliance on anonymous sources, who may or may not exist, betrays a lack of basic journalistic standards on the part of the Wall Street Journal and the fact that the publication has lost all semblance of balanced reporting.


As highlighted by Datuk Rocky, the convenience of keeping the substantiated story is damningly pointing towards the media is in cohort with the ANCs.

Evidently, the incessant rabid lies spewed were part of the strategy to demonise Prime Minister Najib, since the Opposition is unable to topple him or the BN Govt despite the intense tries since nine years ago this April.

ANC elements have been harping on Neo Con Jewish Ruport Murdoch’s controlled media, which is carrying the strategy of demonising Prime Minister Najib.

Australia media reported that News Corp paid NSW Crown Prosecutor for stories. In a parliamentary enquiry, News Corp executive Rebekah Brooks admitted they paid the Police for stories. That is how ethical, they are.

It is without a doubt of the ulterior motive.

Published in: on March 1, 2016 at 17:00  Comments (1)