Ghost of Chinese New Year past

Even when one revere others placing them too high on a pedestal, it is not necessary that one gets the reciprocity on how they reflect on one, based in the past and how is one heading and moving forward, more over after a fresh opportunity to start and do something better.

Asia Nikkei Review story:

Mahathir still living in the shadow of Lee Kuan Yew

Recent tough stance toward Singapore reflects rocky relations of the past

TOKYO — Malaysia’s hard-line attitude with Singapore over a territorial dispute reflects the often fractious relationship that Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad had with his peer, the late Lee Kuan Yew, founding father of the city-state.

The two countries have always had differences, but under former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, cooperation was on the rise. Now, with his successor Mahathir leading the country, Malaysia is walking back on previous agreements with its neighbor while ramping up tensions.

Its latest jabs at Singapore include extending the limits of Johor Bahru port into disputed waters and restricting flights by Singapore airplanes in Malaysian airspace. An emergency foreign ministerial meeting on Jan. 8 temporarily cooled tensions, but relations remain rocky.

After being swept into power last May, the Mahathir administration postponed until 2020 construction on a high-speed rail link between Kuala Lumpur and Singapore that would have cut land travel between the two cities to 90 minutes. Mahathir has also suggested hiking the price of water it supplies to Singapore, and is reviewing a stock market link that was proposed to smooth cross-border retail trading.

Najib’s approach to Singapore was markedly different. His administration promoted the huge Malaysia Iskandar development project in the state of Johor bordering Singapore, and kicked off the high-speed rail plan on which Iskander depends.

The Singapore Strait is a strategic waterway for both Singapore and Malaysia.   © Reuters

He also settled a long-simmering issue involving Malayan Railways, which formerly operated trains into the center of Singapore — a situation regarded as a drag on urban development. The city later praised Najib after his administration relocated the railway’s terminus closer to the border and returned land it had occupied back to the city.

Najib and current Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong are 65 and 66, respectively. Their fathers, Razak Hussein and Lee Kuan Yew, also served as prime minsters. These similarities helped the two forge a bond that resulted in good relations between the countries.

Some analysts are now wondering what went wrong since Mahathir’s return to power. But the answer is fairly clear: He is simply “doing the reverse” of Najib, according to Jun Onozawa, visiting researcher at the Institute for International Trade and Investment.

The Mahathir coalition won last year’s election on a wave of public discontent directed against Najib’s alleged corruption, among other things. Now, Mahathir’s backtracking on the former prime minister’s policies is straining relations with Singapore, Onozawa said.

History also is playing a part in the current state of affairs, as the late Lee Kuan Yew had a somewhat contentious relationship with his former counterpart.

Malaysia gained independence from Britain in 1957 and Singapore followed later. Due to its lack of resources, however, the city became a Malaysian state in 1963.

It was not the best of unions. The central government of Malaysia, comprised primarily of indigenous Malays, and the state government of Singapore, its members largely of Chinese descent, often quarreled. Mahathir, then a young member of Malaysia’s parliament, demanded that the country’s majority Malays have more rights, while Lee espoused equal rights for all, including Chinese and Indians.

Fearing a rise in ethnic tensions, Malaysia expelled Singapore from the union after the two had been together for only 23 months. “For me, it is a moment of anguish,” Lee said at the time, and cried when he met the press as the first prime minister of Singapore — a nation with little land and scant resources.

From then, the two countries embarked on different paths. Malaysia adopted policies giving preferential treatment to “Bhumiputra” — ethnic Malays, who account for 70% of the population. Meanwhile, Singapore gave equal rights to all, despite 70% of its population being Chinese.

Mahathir and Lee became symbols of the two contrasting policies.

The former, who Lee called an “ultra Malay,” adopted a tough stance on Singapore after becoming independent — a view he holds to this day. He has called for a price hike for water supplied to Singapore and has accused its neighbor of cherry picking the benefits of the two countries’ relations to build an efficient economy.

Mahathir’s criticism of Singapore peaked during the Asian financial crisis of 1997. The nation became a market for short-selling Malaysia’s currency and stocks, dealing a serious blow to the country’s economy. Mahathir lashed out at Singapore, calling the hedge funds that operated out of it “rogues.”

Malaysia’s decision to review the stock market trading link reflects Mahathir’s bitter memory of the time, analysts say.

Malaysians have mixed feelings about Singapore and its rapid ascent into the club of developed nations. Even citizens of Chinese descent are split on their views. While many laud Singapore’s lack of ethnic discrimination, others criticize it as taking the best for itself, said Masashi Nakamura, an expert on Southeast Asian affairs at the Institute of Developing Economies.

But while Mahathir should drop any lingering animosity toward Lee — who was two years his elder and died in 2015 — he must keep his finger on the pulse of the nation and the region’s changing dynamics.

Tang Siew Mung, senior fellow at the ISEA-Yusof Ishak Institute, was born in Malaysia but now resides in Singapore. Having lived in both countries, Tang feels that the two are inextricably entwined, and that their mutual reliance cannot be changed.

“Too much is said [about] Singapore’s dependence on Malaysia for its water resources and food, while there is too little acknowledgment [of] how much Malaysia benefits from good relations with its southern neighbor,” he said, pointing out that Malaysian farmers’ biggest export market is Singapore.

And as members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, with each holding strategic locations in the region, any heightening of tensions between them could gravely affect the rest of Asia, especially as the bloc starts to seek its own Indo-Pacific strategy.


Nikkei Asian Review is major business and economic paper in Japan, the country Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad reveres too high, and put it as Malaysia’s technological and economic kiblat.

When he became Prime Minister for the first time 37 years ago, he rudely insulted Britain for Malaysia’s trade (particularly imports), legal and technological kiblat with the policy I’d ‘Buy British Last’ and shifted towards Japan, ‘Look East Policy’.

That affected significant shift of imports, particularly technology and automotive, from Britain to Japan.

Of course, Malaysia then had just gone through the first phase of regaining control of British controlled plantation firm with huge estates in Malaysia, but based in Britain and shares traded in the London bourse.

Dr Mahathir then quickly look to Japan for trade, technology and even banking. The Japanese was quick to capitalise on this opportunity and their FDIs started pouring in.

Japanese industrial plants grew very healthily. They capitalised on cheap labour, raw materials and incentives such as tax-free holidays and used Malaysia to mostly do assembly and contract manufacturing for their produce.

Japanese goods grew to be superior products and in short time, cornered many markets. However, goods and services from Japan are no longer cheap and instead commanded premium.

Malaysian exports to Japan realistically have a small advolarem. What is more damning, transfer of technology (T-o-T) from Japanese industries to Malaysian talents is pathetic.

Japan fully capitalised Malaysia as a staging and assembly station for their produce and nothing more.

There is a Malay euphemism, ‘Hidung tak mancung, pipi tersorong-sorong’.

What it should have been is to throw a Geisha, white powdering the face for pure puppet play purposes only.

Published in: on February 6, 2019 at 11:58  Leave a Comment  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: