Remake of ‘Diehard, Part II’?

The 1990 action blockbuster starring Bruce Willis as ‘Officer Maclane’, who foiled the attempt of ‘some really bad people’ whose had specific interest to seize the control of Dulles International Airport in Washington D.C. on Christmas eve. It was brutal, action packed and a pure “Wrong guy, at the wrong place, at the wrong time” adreline-injceted drama!

We in Malaysia are about to see a real life ‘Die hard, Part II’ soon, believed to be in the making. The wheels are in motion. Like in the movie by Harlin, it is set for Christmas season. However, it is without the explosive materials, non stop burst of  5.56mm and 9mm slugs and smell of burning JetA1 kerosene but it is equally nail-biting as there would be heads rolled.

A bloody nose is more like it.

On 11 August, we scooped a story about the intention of a particular conniving businessman, who tried his best to gain control of Malaysia Airports Holdings Bhd. (MAHB). The attention raised foiled the attempt. At least, to many it was a situation where ‘a spanner was thrown to the works’, especially when that entrepreneur already got his ‘wheels in motion’.

A GLC incorporated in 1991, MAHB now is the operator of 19 Malaysian airports across the nation and 5 other airports in Kazakhstan, two in India, Turkey and Maldives. MAHB’s airport management system is also being deployed in two airports in Cambodia. MAHB collect over RM 1.1 billion in revenue and PATAMI stands at RM 266 million. It is a reasonably good GLC and MAHB is diversifying its business track, which include rental for commercial. Not to mention MAHB posses a lot of very valuable property parcels around airports, particularly in KLIA and Subang.

It is no secret  AirAsia CEO Tony Fernandes has how eyes set on the airport business, to synergies his airline mini empire that he is creating. It started when he tried to manipulate his way through Sime Darby to ask for a brand new dedicated airport for low cost carriers in Labu, which is in the final approach vicinity of KLIA if aircrafts is vectored to land via runaway 32R. The nationwide attention the bloggers created, foiled Fernandes’ snakey move.

His desire to control a dedicated airport never died. Then, he was to said to have manipulated the Perak State Government for a Labu similar airport near Parit Buntar, which is in the captive market of the lucrative travelers’ market of Penang and Kedah.

After successfully managed to wiggle himself into the ‘majors’ game’ by getting Federal Government approval of  Khazanah Holdings Bhd’s ‘share swap’ of 20.5% Malaysia Airlines’ shares for 10% of AirAsia in August, immediate the trained his eyes towards the controls of Malaysia Airports. Recently, we here at BigDogDotCom grabbed the attention of the SOPO cybersurfers about Fernandes managed to get Malaysia Airports to bend their rules on scheduled jet service to Lapangan Terbang Antarabangsa Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah, Subang.

Unbecoming of a director of GLC rubbishing KSU of MOT in social media

Then more of Fernandes’s sordid antics to gain public attention. Nine days ago, him being a director of a GLC tweeted and took pot shots against Malaysia Airports and Chief Secretary to the Ministry of Transport (MOT). His game was strategic enough to demonise the management of Malaysia Airports, even though he was rubbishing on the airport taxes imposed. The fact is that, till early this year AirAsia owed RM 103 million in airport taxes collected upfront from passengers and these travelers already completed their journey. It means that not only the airport taxes were collected upfront and not passed to Malaysia Airports, the services of Malaysia Airports have been fully utilised.

Very reliable sources informed us that Fernandes is connivingly working his way to unseat Malaysia Airports CEO Tan Sri Bashir Ahmad from his job. The past few years, Bahsir is a major ‘pain-in’the-arse’ for Fernandes to bulldoze his way around in the low cost airline business. Now that Fernandes has his feet in a Khazanah controlled GLC as a ‘joint operator’, it is believed that Fernandes is now using this new found clout  within Khazanah to unseat Bashir.

Malaysia Airports Boss Tan Sri Bashir Ahmad Abdul Majid

Certain boardroom maneuvers is expected within a few weeks time.

The facts is that, Malaysia Airports as a GLC under Bashir is ding well. They are bringing in good returns and Malaysia Airports already placed themselves as a global class airport operation group. Bashir’s wealth of experience in Malaysia Airlines to the position of Executive Vice President has proven a valuable asset for Malaysia Airports, particularly in large airports’ business such as KLIA and Penang International.

Its no mystery how Fernandes can achieve this, even without Khazanah’s full support. Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Mohd. Najib Tun Razak’s blue eyed boy Omar Ong is in the BOD of AirAsia, along with veteran MITI Minister Tan Sri Rafidah Ahmad. Probably personalities like CIMB Managing Director Dato’ Seri Nazir Tun Razak, who is personally close to Fernandes and was the ‘adviser and deal maker’ to the Malaysia Airlines-AirAsia ‘share swap’ deal in August could play substantive role in the ‘removal of Bashir’.

The removal of Malaysia Airlines veteran Bashir is very important for Fernandes. The stand off about the use of aerobridges for passengers’, particularly for the comfort of the extremely young, old and handicapped travelers is being put on hold here. The formula is simple; AirAsia simply don’t want to pay for it. The ding-dong back and forth on the aerobridge matter already incurring extra cost to the budgeted RM 2.5 billion low cost carrier dedicated terminal KLIA2, which sit on the west side of the runaway 32L.

This is Malaysia Airports official communique’ for the issue:

NO AEROBRIDGES AT KLIA2 TO CATER FOR AIRASIA’S REQUIREMENT

SEPANG – With the advent of low fare travel and commencement of Low Cost Carrier (LCC) operations in Malaysia, Malaysia Airports recognized the differing requirements of the LCCs and have supported them accordingly. In doing so, Malaysia Airports has played a key role in promoting low fare travel and the development of LCCs in Malaysia. Tan Sri Bashir clarified “As an airport operator, it is important that we support the business models of both the full service airlines as well as the LCCs.  Each has a different business model and therefore has different requirements.”

One of the requirements is in regard to the usage of aerobridges in their operations. In the case of AirAsia, they had explained that their business model requires a quick turnaround time in order to increase aircraft utilisation. This would then allow them to operate additional sectors in a day and enable them to reduce cost and therefore offer lower fares. This works especially well for short and medium haul sectors but less so for long haul sectors such as those operated by AirAsiaX. AirAsia therefore appealed for an exemption from Malaysia Airports’s policy of requiring airlines to use aerobridges. In order to support AirAsia’s business model, this exemption was given. Subsequently it had to be extended to some other LCCs as well.  By this exemption, AirAsia has the option of not using aerobridges. However in practice, AirAsia does use the aerobridges during inclement weather at airports in Malaysia where aerobridges are provided.

Airports in other countries in the region make it mandatory for airlines to use aerobridges where provided, in order to enhance passenger convenience, safety and security. Should the airlines choose not to use aerobridges, they then have to park the aircraft in a remote position and bus the passengers to the terminal.  AirAsia had explained that they use aerobridges at these other countries as they are compelled to adhere to the regulatory requirements at these airports, as no exemptions are given.

Based on AirAsia’s decision not to use aerobridges at klia2, the terminal for LCCs, even during inclement weather or for long haul operations, the terminal is being constructed without the installation of aerobridges and instead ramps will be provided. As AirAsia and AirAsiaX would be the major airlines at klia2, it may not be worthwhile to incur the cost if the aerobridges are not going to be used. However provision has been made in the design of the terminal to accommodate the installation of aerobridges, if so required at any time, by AirAsia group or any other LCCs. Discussions will be held with other LCCs as well on their requirements.

The current charge to the airline for the use of the aerobridge is RM85.00 per usage. Based on a full A320 aircraft carrying 180 passengers for both arriving and departing flights, the cost of using the aerobridge works out to be less than 25 sen per passenger. This makes Malaysia Airports’ charge for the aerobridge the lowest in the region.

Malaysia Airports has continually received numerous feedbacks from the public requesting that all airlines be required to use aerobridges in order to avoid inconvenience to passengers. Tan Sri Bashir added, “As such, we will continue to engage AirAsia and AirAsiaX, as well as other airlines to look into the possibility of further aligning their operations to the needs of passengers.”

More importantly, if Bashir could be unseated and Khazanah appoints someone else who is more  ‘friendly’ to Fernandes, then the opportunities for the latter is enormous. Not only from the business generated from airport operations, Malaysia Airports is also gearing themselves up for the asset management of facilities which will be high rental due to the demand for retail. Malaysia Airports would also own and manage shopping malls.

Lets hope this Fernandes guy trying to be Colonel Stewart and hold Dulles Airport in a seizure for personal interest, does not materialise. Malaysia Airports is in good hands at the moment and it is not anyone’s affairs to determine who should run all the nineteen plus five airports.

Published in: on November 24, 2011 at 12:00  Comments (18)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://bigdogdotcom.wordpress.com/2011/11/24/remake-of-diehard-part-ii/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

18 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Colonel Steward did not excuted his scheme alone… Theres lot of insiders who sided with him and the police Chief just plain DUMB!

    Bust those insiders first and ‘gegar’ to wake up the police chief!!!

  2. Rafidah already in his side…the game are more complicated right now…

    • Rafidah should pencen from doing any more business. She has made enough and should not be too greedy. People like Rafidah helped bring down Umno.

  3. I thought that Tan Sri Azman Mokhtar has said the MAB is doing very well under Tan Sri Bashir. Don’t tell me that we can no longer trust Tan Sri Azman anymore?

    Please confirm whether it was true that Tan Sri Azman said that.

    • Azman is not the only person in Khazanah and he doesn’t behave like an autocrat.

      There are others who are able to pull all sorts of tricks, especially when maneuvers are backed by a selected ‘inner circle’. Probably, they could ‘pressure’ for persons like Azman to change his mind.

  4. The problem could be the bigger hands above MAHB’s good hand who could unseat Bashir. They must be watched as by a hawk.

  5. Biggie,

    I know where this Greedy Ular aka Towkay Keling Wayang is heading. Its so obvious! He wants KLIA to be renamed as ‘Tony Fernandes International Airport’.

    Just stay ‘Tune’ & watch! Don’t forget your big tub of caramelized/salted popcorn. The series of drama would be intriguing!

    I bet like the other Keling Ular aka Kali, he’ll throw in Tun Dr Mahathir’s name for the added fun!

    Anak Wayang (show biz) la kata kan!

    • Why are the Malays stupid enough to allow these despicable Kelings to get their way.

      • When I was young, my late mother told me: Never, ever trust a Keling. She was right.

      • Isn’t Omar Ong the key?

        Remember who appointed OO to Petronas? Despite being rejected the first time. And Hassan Merican lost his job.

        And Nazir Razak got huge fees for “advising”. Or providing “consultancy services”. Whether all for CIMB, we don’t know.

        I think there are a lot of skeletons in the cupboard. People with access should try and open it.

  6. This guy should be kicked out from MAS and restricted to operating only AirAsia. We already have too many conniving businessmen in Malaysia but this guy takes the cake.

  7. wait till TUN M comment on this??!!

  8. Well written, Bro. Keep it up.
    I think we need a sledge hammer to wake up all these gaji buta autocratic leaders.

    Think people, think very hard.
    Air Asia 9000 employees = Revenue RM 4 billions
    MAS 19000 employees = Revenue RM 14 billions
    MAS problems are not revenue, but cost.

    Just reduce 5% of the expenses, MAS would have made a profit of RM 700 millions

    Former MAS Managing Director Tan Sri Abdul Aziz’s was right when he said
    “I am surprised that so many clever people cannot understand simple arithmetic.”

    More details below
    http://mastroubleshooters.blogspot.com/2011/11/7-reasons-why-khazanah-should-not.html

    http://mastroubleshooters.blogspot.com/2011/11/key-observations-and-recommendations-by.html

  9. […] card all the while. Just like Opposition politicians. Their staregy, like Fernandes, is to make ‘pre-emptive strikes’ and cast the doubt ahead before the issue is ready for public […]

  10. […] Remake of ‘Diehard, Part II’? […]

  11. […] in a rebellious tone. That is should be considered as ‘corporate anarchy’. Now, he is demonising MAHB CEO Bashir Ahmad in his bid to go after the airport business, the terrorist […]

  12. […] MAHB when his whims and fancies didn’t actually go how he wanted. That is probably include getting rid of MAHB MD Tan Sri Bashir Ahmad Abdul Majid and got himself in, just like how he got Khazanah Holdings Bhd. for the […]

  13. […] after MAHB when his whims and fancies didn’t actually go how he wanted. That is probably includegetting rid of MAHB MD Tan Sri Bashir Ahmad Abdul Majid and got himself in, just like how he got Khazanah Holdings Bhd. for […]


Leave a comment