Umum mengetahui tentang gelombang politik yang amat besar sedang melanda orang melayu khususnya UMNO. Ini dapat ditafsirkan dengan jelas terhadap fakta keputusan pilihanraya umum baru-baru ini yang sokongan pengundi terhadap BN dan UMNO khususnya telah merudum. Tidak pernah dalam sejarah pilihanraya Malaysia ini UMNO dan Barisan Nasional menerima tamparan yang hebat dari pengaruh parti pembangkang.
Kita harus sama-sama bersetuju dan menerima hakikat yang parti UMNO yang kita cintai ini berada di dalam keadaan yang lemah. Selama ini kita sebagai ahli UMNO tidak pernah termimpi yang perkara ini boleh berlaku terhadap UMNO. Mungkin juga selama ini kita di buai oleh mimpi-mimpi indah yang kekuatan UMNO tidak akan terhakis selama-lamanya. Kita juga harus menerima hakikat yang ini adalah ujian politik yang amat besar yang harus di tempuh oleh ahli-ahli dan semua pemimpin UMNO disebabkan oleh kelekaan kita semua. Amat menyedihkan yang kestabilan kontrak sosial yang telah direncanakan oleh Tunku Abdul Rahman, Tan Cheng Lock dan Tun Sambathan sejak akhir-akhir ini di mainkan oleh pihak-pihak tertentu untuk kepentingan politik disebabkan oleh kelemahan UMNO sendiri.
Lebih malang lagi, tiada tindakan yang jitu dan berkesan yang direncanakan untuk menangani isu-isu semasa. Ahli-ahli UMNO mahu pun pemimpin tertinggi UMNO seperti hanya berharap yang masaalah yang dihadapi akan usang secara semulajadi tanpa menerima hakikat yang scenario politik semasa sedang mengalami perubahan yang amat drastik. Perubahan arus politik sekarang ini menuntut kita untuk berhenti sejenak dan berfikir secara jujur tentang tindakan yang lebih “out of the box” untuk memenangi kembali hati orang-orang melayu khususnya peringkat akar umbi ahli-ahli UMNO. Pemimpin UMNO harus akur dan belajar untuk memikul dan menerima tanggungjawab atas apa yang berlaku sekarang ini.
Demi kepentingan parti dan menolak kepentingan individu, saya dengan ini ingin membawa usul untuk diperbincangkan dalam persidangan ini.
Berasaskan kuasa yang termaktub dalam Fasal 17.5.1 Perlembagaan UMNO; demi untuk menyelamatkan UMNO, agama, bangsa dan tanahair; maka UMNO Cawangan Sungai Buloh Country Resort, Bahagian Kuala Selangor, dalam Persidangan Tahunan pada 9 Ogos 2008, mendesak UMNO Bahagian Kuala Selangor menggunakan Fasal 14.5.3 untuk mengemukakan satu usul ke peringkat PAU 2008 meminta tempoh peralihan kuasa daripada Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi kepada Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, dilakukan mulai 1 Januari 2009.
Sebab-sebab mengapa peralihan kuasa harus dilakukan segera :-
a) Sebab utama ialah ketidakyakinan rakyat atas pucuk pimpinan kini dalam menangani masalah negara
b) Memastikan setiap ahli umno memainkan peranan lebih terus dan telus dalam memilih pemimpin. Ini dapat dilakukan dengan memastikan hasrat dan luahan kami ini di sampaikan kepada kepimpinan tertinggi UMNO.
c) Kekuatan Umno memerlukan masa ynag panjang untuk dipulihkan
sebelum PRU 13. Barisan pucuk pimpinan perlu di perkuat dari sekarang.
d) Ahli umno yg menjadi pembangkang di 5 negeri dan 1 wp perlu umno yg lebih kuat dan bukan yg rapuh bagi menyelamatkan negeri2 tersebut dari terus menjadi negeri dibawah pemerintahan PR.
diluluskan sebulat suara:
UMNO Cawangan Sg. Buloh Country Resort
Bahagian Kuala Selangor
9 Ogos 2008
The "thirteen million plus Ringgit" guy rambles.... 
Tahniah kepada UMNO cawangan Sg Buloh Country Resort.
Ini yang di katakan berani. Sapa lagi yang berani?
Mesyuarat Bahagian Kuala Selangor pastikan Pemuda calonkan Dato’ Mukhriz
Apa sangat dengan usul menggesa ‘Peralihan Kuasa’ lebih awal oleh UMNO Cawangan Sg Buloh Country Resort ni berbanding dengan beratus-ratus lagi cawangan yang ada..
Mereka juga pandai main golf, itu kelebihannya! Hidup KJ!
Go fir it Sg Buloh……I support u all 1000%
tahniah….
inilah yang kita mahu lihat keberanian mesyuarat umno setiap peringkat,ugut saja bubar cawangan sebagai protes biar mereka tahu kita bukan saja ahli umno tetapi sebagai rakyat malaysia dah muak dan jelak dengan pemimpin lembik.saya pun dah keluar umno malu nak jadi ahli parti yang menyusahkan rakyat & kini penuh dengan skandal.
umno tak salah tapi pemimpin gila kuasa yang salah
Inilah masanya kalau nak jadi HERO bangsa!
Kegiatan pemilihan pimpinan parti semakin rancak dijalankaan sahingga mereka, pemimpin UMNO, terlupa tanggungjawab kepada rakyat. Disamping itu tohmahan dan tuduhan peranan politik wang juga semakin rancak diperkatakan.UMNO sebenarnya sudah terhimpit oleh kerana kegagalan sendiri dan tiap anggota dari akar umbi hingga keatas harus ditanya secara pertubi tubi samada mereka hendak memilih wang atau lihat bangsa terbuang. Tepok dada tanya selera sudah ada orang yang sanggup menggadaikan maruah bangsa!
yalah boleh cadanglah.
bahgaian nak buaat apa?
hey, bd, aku tanya ketua bahagian
– apa macam, datuk?
member kutuk umno tak radical…
with respect to you but that is not even a good arguement. UMNO is the fairest in the land.
nak bantai bantai lani, mukhriz
tanya bahagian tanjung if they are radical enough to nominate you for the vice president? Why don’t you give him a call and ask him does he have the balls to be ultra hardcore UMNO leader? apa takut, he is a very honest and open minded man and a strong ketua bahagian – boleh test!
orang islam yang menceburi dalam arena politik sudah banyak terpesong dari larangan agama islam, untuk mencapai matlamat rasuah , fitnah, menganiaya sesama sendiri, hasrat dengki, sudah menjadi seperti rukun hidup mereka. FIKIR SEJENAK. JGA MARAH YA
Hi
I am a regular visitor 2 ur blog, always interesting to c ur viewpoint.
I refer to your distress over the Social Contract. “Amat menyedihkan yang kestabilan kontrak sosial yang telah direncanakan oleh Tunku Abdul Rahman, Tan Cheng Lock dan Tun Sambathan sejak akhir-akhir ini di mainkan oleh pihak-pihak tertentu untuk kepentingan politik disebabkan oleh kelemahan UMNO sendiri.”
I am wondering why you continue to fault these “pihak-pihak tertentu” over the violation and abuse of the social contract. Please take a step back and see who really violated the social contract.
Even the great Tun Ismail (who was feared by all Malaysians when he was alive)stated that the rule of law is paramount AND he put expiry dates on certain social re-engineering proposals that were implemented. Yet today, certain groups are the 1st to say that no expiry date exists. Certain groups mistreat their fellow component parties in BN. Other than YB Markiman, no one bothered standing up and saying what was said during the UMNO AGM had hurt the non-Bumi’s and repair work had to be done. No one bothered. Likewise the abuse other BN component party heads got from 2nd & 3rd tier members of UMNO. Remember the UMNO delegates who talked down to Gerakan’s Koh, & MIC’s Samyvellu. I m no fan of Samyvellu, but he is the head of a component party, and he should be treated with respect (even though he doesnt deserve any respect), this is Adat. Adat was violated, and that was the beginning of the end.
Malays are the majority race, and Islam’s position as the religion of this nation is guaranteed in the constitution. Only people who do not value the constitution or understand its pre-eminence, get emotional over non-issues. No one is questioning this.
What is being questioned is the wholesale “rasuah” mentality and I am better than everyone else, that is becoming unchecked in this nation? These same people accept “lubrication to do their job” and consider it “rezeki”. My question is how will God view this, using His Name in vain and using His name to launder illegal funds. Do you think God will allow himself to be contaminated by these illegal acts.
The person in the mirror every morning has to ask him/herself some important questions, and among them are whether they can continue to violate the social contract (else they are not aware of the social contract) and whether acceptance of “lubrication” can be justified. They have to understand that praying after receiving this illgotten “rezeki” is not goin to help.
But I am glad that you highlight tough questions, and allow 2 way communication. Congratulations.
never could understand muftis
mixed them up with puttees
some muftis spot sharp goatees
some muftis got big teeth.
something for Mukhriz and MoF2:
The crisis: a tale of two monetary policies
By Martin Feldstein
Published: August 7 2008 19:39 | Last updated: August 7 2008 19:39
The European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve are facing similar problems but pursuing different policies. The ECB has been raising interest rates while the Fed has been cutting them. The overnight federal funds rate is now 2 per cent while the corresponding ECB rate is 4.25 per cent. Which central bank is doing the right thing? Or could they both be?
Inflation is a significant problem in both the eurozone and the US, with a headline consumer inflation rate over the past 12 months of 4 per cent in the eurozone and 5 per cent in the US. Both economies are also facing declining economic activity with falling employment and lower industrial production.
The sharp rise in the prices of energy and food during the past 12 months will undoubtedly spill over into higher prices for other products in both the US and Europe. The primary challenge for both central banks is to limit this inflationary shock to a one-time pass through, avoiding the rise in wages that would occur if employees attempted to offset the decline of their real incomes. It was that futile wage-price spiral that drove inflation rates in the 1970s to double-digit levels. Preventing a repetition of that requires convincing the public that today’s high inflation rate will soon decline.
Despite the similar problems faced by the two central banks, there are important differences that justify their separate strategies. The contrast between the ECB’s mandate to achieve price stability and the Fed’s “dual mandate” to balance the goals of price stability and employment is not just an accident of legislative history but a reflection of fundamental differences between the two economies. Those differences make it more difficult to tame inflation expectations in Europe and therefore require the ECB’s tougher policy.
The role of trade unions is the most important difference. Only 7.5 per cent of US private sector employees are union members and they are concentrated in automotive, airline, construction and other depressed industries. In contrast, more than 25 per cent of employees in the European Union are members of trade unions and in some EU countries the wages set in union contracts are automatically extended to other companies in the same industry.
Because of this union power, the ECB must persuade union members and their leaders that it is determined to bring inflation down to its target level of less than 2 per cent. The ECB’s tough stance and exclusive emphasis on price stability is crucial to shifting inflation expectations and persuading unions to accept the rise in food and energy prices without pressing for offsetting wage gains.
In contrast, the Fed does not have to worry in the same way about union power and collective bargaining. Wage setting is decentralised and wage contracts do not have the formal links of wages to inflation that intensified the wage-price spiral of the 1970s.
Differences in the inflation histories also influence today’s appropriate policies of the ECB and the Fed. Although Americans remember the double-digit inflation of the late 1970s and early 1980s, there has been no US experience similar to the earlier hyperinflations in Germany and other EU countries. The ECB pursues a tough inflation target policy to persuade Europeans that there is not even a small probability of returning to those conditions.
Finally, the ECB recognises that it is still a very young institution that must prove to the European public that it will follow the successful anti-inflation tradition of the German Bundesbank. But a decade of relatively good performance is not a reliable guide to the future. The ECB is only now facing its first challenge of imported high inflation and the expanding membership of the European monetary union is bringing new voting representatives to the ECB whose views are yet to be tested.
The power of Europe’s unions, its history of hyperinflation and the need to develop credibility for a young institution all justify the ECB’s tough stance. Because the Fed does not have these problems but faces a potentially serious recession, it is prepared to gamble that the weakness in US employment and the general decline in economic activity will prevent a wage-price spiral without further increases in the interest rate. If food and energy prices remain at today’s level and wage costs do not accelerate, the overall consumer price index inflation will decline by next year to an annual rate of less than 3 per cent. I think the Fed’s current interest rate strategy makes sense but would be too risky for the ECB.
The writer is professor of economics at Harvard University
which way is it for Malaysia, Mukhriz?
cheaper oil but a USdollar that is disintegrating…
Dear Mr BobSam,
That issue never happened under the leadership of Pak Lah and KJ.
Sdra. Umno cawangan masjid pakista bahagian titiwangsa juga membuat usul yang sama dan menamakan Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah>Presiden.
Timb.Ketua
Sdra. Umno cawangan masjid pakistan zone kg. bharu bahagian titiwangsa juga membuat usul yang sama dan menamakan Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah>Presiden.
Timb.Ketua
Banyak sangat yang menghasut sana sini sekarang, tu sebab UMNO jadi huru hara. Nak pulak lepas si Anwar tu terlepas.